I'm only interested in "our" stuff as well, I was just thinking 20 years ahead :) when it's the focus for all Conservation :) :) ....
It might be good to have a catch-all name, even though for now it's just concerned with ancient stuff. Links are so good for driving traffic and alerting Google. But I really don't have any strong feelings on the subject. If most people prefer to include Ancient etc that's fine by me.
"Action" is very good. Neatly sets the agenda.
This topic is locked | Posted by nigelswift 5th November 2003ce 15:56 |
Getting Serious about Conservation (nigelswift, Nov 05, 2003, 07:09)- Re: Getting Serious about Conservation (FourWinds, Nov 05, 2003, 08:39)
- Re: Getting Serious about Conservation (BrigantesNation, Nov 05, 2003, 10:22)
- rockulous idea sirrah... (morfe, Nov 05, 2003, 15:41)
- Re: rockulous idea sirrah... (morfe, Nov 05, 2003, 15:45)
- Re: rockulous idea sirrah... (Moth, Nov 05, 2003, 15:55)
- Re: rockulous idea sirrah... (Kammer, Nov 05, 2003, 15:59)
- Re: rockulous idea sirrah... (FourWinds, Nov 05, 2003, 16:02)
- Re: rockulous idea sirrah... (Kozmik_Ken, Nov 05, 2003, 16:08)
- Re: rockulous idea sirrah... (Moth, Nov 05, 2003, 16:15)
- Re: rockulous idea sirrah... (Kozmik_Ken, Nov 05, 2003, 16:18)
- AHA (morfe, Nov 05, 2003, 16:20)
- AFAH (Jane, Nov 05, 2003, 16:22)
- Re: rockulous idea sirrah... (Kammer, Nov 05, 2003, 16:45)
- Re: rockulous idea sirrah... (nigelswift, Nov 05, 2003, 16:26)
- Re: rockulous idea sirrah... (Moth, Nov 05, 2003, 16:29)
- Re: rockulous idea sirrah... (Earthstepper, Nov 05, 2003, 16:36)
- Re: rockulous idea sirrah... (Kozmik_Ken, Nov 05, 2003, 16:36)
- Re: rockulous idea sirrah... (BrigantesNation, Nov 05, 2003, 17:39)
- Re: rockulous idea sirrah... (FourWinds, Nov 05, 2003, 16:01)
- Here's my best shot... (Kammer, Nov 05, 2003, 16:51)
- Re: Getting Serious about Conservation (ocifant, Nov 05, 2003, 19:02)
- Re: Getting Serious about Conservation (nigelswift, Nov 05, 2003, 19:57)
- Re: Getting Serious about Conservation (BrigantesNation, Nov 05, 2003, 20:01)
- Re: Getting Serious about Conservation (FourWinds, Nov 05, 2003, 21:01)
- Re: Getting Serious about Conservation (nigelswift, Nov 05, 2003, 21:14)
- Re: Getting Serious about Conservation (FourWinds, Nov 05, 2003, 21:43)
- Re: Getting Serious about Conservation (BrigantesNation, Nov 05, 2003, 21:59)
- DMV (FourWinds, Nov 05, 2003, 22:04)
- Re: DMV (BrigantesNation, Nov 05, 2003, 22:24)
- Oh! (FourWinds, Nov 06, 2003, 06:44)
- Proposed Format, for discussion (nigelswift, Nov 06, 2003, 07:44)
- Re: Proposed Format, for discussion (BrigantesNation, Nov 06, 2003, 09:51)
- Both? (FourWinds, Nov 06, 2003, 10:35)
- Dual identity? (Earthstepper, Nov 06, 2003, 09:57)
- Re: Proposed Format, for discussion (FourWinds, Nov 06, 2003, 10:34)
- How about ... (FourWinds, Nov 05, 2003, 20:52)
- Re: Getting Serious about Conservation (wysefool, Nov 05, 2003, 21:08)
- Re: Getting Serious about Conservation (Steve Gray, Nov 06, 2003, 08:31)
- Let's settle the name today (nigelswift, Nov 06, 2003, 13:28)
- Re: Let's settle the name today (nickbrand, Nov 06, 2003, 13:38)
- Re: Let's settle the name today (Kozmik_Ken, Nov 06, 2003, 14:11)
- Heritage Action (grrr, Nov 06, 2003, 14:17)
- Re: Heritage Action (morfe, Nov 06, 2003, 14:41)
- Re: Heritage Action (Kozmik_Ken, Nov 06, 2003, 14:42)
- Re: Heritage Action Group (Moth, Nov 06, 2003, 14:43)
- Re: Heritage Action Group (Kozmik_Ken, Nov 06, 2003, 14:51)
- Re: Heritage Action Group (morfe, Nov 06, 2003, 15:03)
- Re: Heritage Action Group (nigelswift, Nov 06, 2003, 15:04)
- DO NOT GO FOR HAG !!! (FourWinds, Nov 06, 2003, 15:22)
- Re: Heritage Action Group (Earthstepper, Nov 06, 2003, 16:12)
- Re: Getting Serious about Conservation (Kammer, Nov 06, 2003, 15:37)
- Re: Getting Serious about Conservation (Moth, Nov 06, 2003, 16:32)
|
|