The thing is, Heritage Conservation is such a vast field I think we need to define a role for ourselves, rather than merge into the general mass. After all, the National Trust we ain't, and most people here although they "care" seem more drawn to "fight" than the average heritage enthusiast. That could be our role, publicizing and running specific campaigns. It would keep the thing fresh and enthusiastic.
("Publicizing" again. Sorry Mr Windz).
This topic is locked | Posted by nigelswift 5th November 2003ce 11:40 |
Getting Serious about Conservation (nigelswift, Nov 05, 2003, 07:09)- Re: Getting Serious about Conservation (FourWinds, Nov 05, 2003, 08:39)
- Re: Getting Serious about Conservation (BrigantesNation, Nov 05, 2003, 10:22)
- rockulous idea sirrah... (morfe, Nov 05, 2003, 15:41)
- Re: rockulous idea sirrah... (morfe, Nov 05, 2003, 15:45)
- Re: rockulous idea sirrah... (Moth, Nov 05, 2003, 15:55)
- Re: rockulous idea sirrah... (Kammer, Nov 05, 2003, 15:59)
- Re: rockulous idea sirrah... (FourWinds, Nov 05, 2003, 16:02)
- Re: rockulous idea sirrah... (Kozmik_Ken, Nov 05, 2003, 16:08)
- Re: rockulous idea sirrah... (Moth, Nov 05, 2003, 16:15)
- Re: rockulous idea sirrah... (Kozmik_Ken, Nov 05, 2003, 16:18)
- AHA (morfe, Nov 05, 2003, 16:20)
- AFAH (Jane, Nov 05, 2003, 16:22)
- Re: rockulous idea sirrah... (Kammer, Nov 05, 2003, 16:45)
- Re: rockulous idea sirrah... (nigelswift, Nov 05, 2003, 16:26)
- Re: rockulous idea sirrah... (Moth, Nov 05, 2003, 16:29)
- Re: rockulous idea sirrah... (Earthstepper, Nov 05, 2003, 16:36)
- Re: rockulous idea sirrah... (Kozmik_Ken, Nov 05, 2003, 16:36)
- Re: rockulous idea sirrah... (BrigantesNation, Nov 05, 2003, 17:39)
- Re: rockulous idea sirrah... (FourWinds, Nov 05, 2003, 16:01)
- Here's my best shot... (Kammer, Nov 05, 2003, 16:51)
- Re: Getting Serious about Conservation (ocifant, Nov 05, 2003, 19:02)
- Re: Getting Serious about Conservation (nigelswift, Nov 05, 2003, 19:57)
- Re: Getting Serious about Conservation (BrigantesNation, Nov 05, 2003, 20:01)
- Re: Getting Serious about Conservation (FourWinds, Nov 05, 2003, 21:01)
- Re: Getting Serious about Conservation (nigelswift, Nov 05, 2003, 21:14)
- Re: Getting Serious about Conservation (FourWinds, Nov 05, 2003, 21:43)
- Re: Getting Serious about Conservation (BrigantesNation, Nov 05, 2003, 21:59)
- DMV (FourWinds, Nov 05, 2003, 22:04)
- Re: DMV (BrigantesNation, Nov 05, 2003, 22:24)
- Oh! (FourWinds, Nov 06, 2003, 06:44)
- Proposed Format, for discussion (nigelswift, Nov 06, 2003, 07:44)
- Re: Proposed Format, for discussion (BrigantesNation, Nov 06, 2003, 09:51)
- Both? (FourWinds, Nov 06, 2003, 10:35)
- Dual identity? (Earthstepper, Nov 06, 2003, 09:57)
- Re: Proposed Format, for discussion (FourWinds, Nov 06, 2003, 10:34)
- How about ... (FourWinds, Nov 05, 2003, 20:52)
- Re: Getting Serious about Conservation (wysefool, Nov 05, 2003, 21:08)
- Re: Getting Serious about Conservation (Steve Gray, Nov 06, 2003, 08:31)
- Let's settle the name today (nigelswift, Nov 06, 2003, 13:28)
- Re: Let's settle the name today (nickbrand, Nov 06, 2003, 13:38)
- Re: Let's settle the name today (Kozmik_Ken, Nov 06, 2003, 14:11)
- Heritage Action (grrr, Nov 06, 2003, 14:17)
- Re: Heritage Action (morfe, Nov 06, 2003, 14:41)
- Re: Heritage Action (Kozmik_Ken, Nov 06, 2003, 14:42)
- Re: Heritage Action Group (Moth, Nov 06, 2003, 14:43)
- Re: Heritage Action Group (Kozmik_Ken, Nov 06, 2003, 14:51)
- Re: Heritage Action Group (morfe, Nov 06, 2003, 15:03)
- Re: Heritage Action Group (nigelswift, Nov 06, 2003, 15:04)
- DO NOT GO FOR HAG !!! (FourWinds, Nov 06, 2003, 15:22)
- Re: Heritage Action Group (Earthstepper, Nov 06, 2003, 16:12)
- Re: Getting Serious about Conservation (Kammer, Nov 06, 2003, 15:37)
- Re: Getting Serious about Conservation (Moth, Nov 06, 2003, 16:32)
|
|