Unfortunately, I think that `stone`s marked on the map is not sufficient evidence of a row, especially as they are not in a straight line.
You`d need to cite a written reference to them to convince anyone that a row existed there.
I had a look on www.old-maps.co.uk and their map from 1856AD has no stones identified north of the river, but three marked to the south of the river.
baz
 Reply | with quote | Posted by baza
7th September 2003ce
12:13 |
Comments please (BrigantesNation, Sep 06, 2003, 21:44)- Re: Comments please (Earthstepper, Sep 07, 2003, 09:45)
- Re: Comments please (baza, Sep 07, 2003, 12:13)
- Re: Comments please (Earthstepper, Sep 07, 2003, 13:56)
- A comment from ... (BlueGloves, Sep 07, 2003, 20:30)
|
|
Head To Head 
Comments please (BrigantesNation)