A Lych gate as a pair of stones ?
But why did we pair stones so avidly back then ? Left and right ? We've found it so we'll show it ?
The proddies were probably better at recording the ancient placenames (formally) though. The closest thing to a church back four thousand years was a hill - the more glacial the better.
I don't know what I'm going to find when I get back to Camp1 this afternoon. As I was leaving on Monday the keepers went swirling in with their new Landrovers, riding shotgun to the little digger. This JCB will be acting as a toreodor (sorry) before the big buggers arrive. I've got some little lumps of Gur for the fuel systems. In the right circumstances that will construe as using reasonable force. Two ballaun stones, a little re-erected standing stone and the capstone off something too. It's futile, of course.
English Nature seemed to give *backdated* permission for a road a mile long in their SSSI. Backdated nine months - the moor's only been sold six. I've certainly never seen that happen before (Don't Call Me Mark Thatcher). TomBo, our budding shaman, maybe fifteen miles away as the crow flies, might have written to the local MP, even. I can see him telling me the stonecrusher is really a big baler or a new type of combine! The EN field officer told me that as the burial mound had already had some stone taken then that made it more ok to take the rest of it. A local placename - the Three Pikes - needs revision. One Pike |
He's gone
(to 520m.)
Reply | with quote | Posted by AtomicMutton 31st July 2003ce 08:03 |
Sacred Landscapes (nigelswift, Jul 30, 2003, 09:05)- Re: Sacred Landscapes (ocifant, Jul 30, 2003, 09:15)
- Re: Sacred Landscapes (Kammer, Jul 30, 2003, 09:36)
- Re: Sacred Landscapes (BrigantesNation, Jul 30, 2003, 10:37)
- Re: Sacred Landscapes (baza, Jul 30, 2003, 19:20)
- Are you really ... (FourWinds, Jul 30, 2003, 19:43)
- Re: Sacred ? (Moon Cat, Jul 30, 2003, 20:57)
- All sacred. (morfe, Jul 30, 2003, 20:58)
- Unbelievable (morfe, Jul 30, 2003, 21:03)
- Nothing is sacred (morfe, Jul 30, 2003, 21:22)
- Re: Nothing is sacred (baza, Jul 30, 2003, 21:45)
- Got it wrong? (morfe, Jul 30, 2003, 21:50)
- Re: Got it wrong? (baza, Jul 30, 2003, 22:31)
- Re: Got it wrong? (morfe, Jul 30, 2003, 23:23)
- Re: Got it wrong? (baza, Jul 31, 2003, 01:22)
- Is it? (BrigantesNation, Jul 31, 2003, 01:44)
- Re: Is it? (FourWinds, Jul 31, 2003, 06:44)
- And ... (FourWinds, Jul 31, 2003, 06:50)
- Well no.. (BrigantesNation, Jul 31, 2003, 08:03)
- Don't stop ... (AtomicMutton, Jul 31, 2003, 08:03)
- Re: Got it wrong? (morfe, Jul 31, 2003, 17:10)
- Sacred is... (Kammer, Jul 30, 2003, 21:52)
- Re: sacred in the eye? (Moon Cat, Jul 30, 2003, 23:46)
- Re: sacred in the eye? (morfe, Jul 31, 2003, 00:26)
- Re: sacred in the eye? (Moth, Jul 31, 2003, 14:08)
- Re: sacred in the eye? (morfe, Jul 31, 2003, 19:01)
- Re: sacred in the eye? (Moth, Jul 31, 2003, 19:43)
- Re: sacred in the eye? (morfe, Jul 31, 2003, 19:48)
- Re: sacred in the eye? (morfe, Jul 31, 2003, 19:56)
- Re: sacred in the eye? (Moth, Jul 31, 2003, 20:25)
- Re: sacred in the eye? (nigelswift, Jul 31, 2003, 21:16)
- Re: sacred in the eye? (Moth, Jul 31, 2003, 21:19)
- Shouldn't have said a word! (morfe, Jul 31, 2003, 21:24)
- Re: sacred in the eye? (Shestu, Jul 31, 2003, 21:26)
- Re: sacred in the eye? (nigelswift, Jul 31, 2003, 21:30)
- Re: sacred in the eye? (Moth, Jul 31, 2003, 21:34)
- Re: sacred in the eye? (nigelswift, Jul 31, 2003, 21:49)
- Oi! (Moth, Jul 31, 2003, 21:53)
- Re: Oi! (nigelswift, Jul 31, 2003, 22:09)
- Aaaah! (Moth, Jul 31, 2003, 22:23)
- Re: sacred in the eye? (Shestu, Jul 31, 2003, 21:38)
- Re: sacred in the eye? (pure joy, Aug 03, 2003, 11:25)
- Re: Sacred Landscapes (Kammer, Jul 30, 2003, 21:44)
- Re: Sacred Landscapes (morfe, Jul 30, 2003, 21:11)
- Interesting cross-cultural article (morfe, Jul 30, 2003, 21:14)
- Re: Sacred Landscapes (wychburyman, Jul 30, 2003, 21:34)
- words and power (Annexus Quam, Jul 30, 2003, 21:39)
- Re: Sacred Landscapes (nigelswift, Jul 30, 2003, 21:59)
- Am I really me? (FourWinds, Jul 30, 2003, 23:35)
- Nature (Annexus Quam, Jul 31, 2003, 09:58)
- Re: Sacred Landscapes (moss, Jul 31, 2003, 11:25)
- TimeGhost (TomBo, Jul 31, 2003, 11:25)
- Re: TimeGhost (BrigantesNation, Jul 31, 2003, 11:39)
- Re: TimeGhost (TomBo, Jul 31, 2003, 11:52)
- Re: TimeGhost (BrigantesNation, Jul 31, 2003, 12:12)
- Re: TimeGhost (baza, Jul 31, 2003, 12:26)
- Re: TimeGhost (TomBo, Jul 31, 2003, 12:39)
- Re: TimeGhost (FourWinds, Jul 31, 2003, 12:46)
- Re: TimeGhost (Moth, Jul 31, 2003, 16:09)
- Pantheism? (morfe, Jul 31, 2003, 18:50)
- Re: Pantheism? (TomBo, Jul 31, 2003, 20:54)
- Only (morfe, Jul 31, 2003, 20:58)
- Tombo... (Moth, Jul 31, 2003, 21:32)
- Re: Pantheism? (Moth, Jul 31, 2003, 21:28)
- Re: TimeGhost (Jane, Jul 31, 2003, 12:31)
- Re: TimeGhost (nigelswift, Jul 31, 2003, 12:53)
- Re: TimeGhost (FourWinds, Jul 31, 2003, 12:56)
- Re: TimeGhost (Jane, Jul 31, 2003, 14:14)
- Spot on (morfe, Jul 31, 2003, 17:20)
- BTW... (nigelswift, Jul 31, 2003, 21:59)
- Re: TimeGhost (TomBo, Jul 31, 2003, 20:59)
- Re: TimeGhost (TomBo, Jul 31, 2003, 21:39)
- Re: TimeGhost (FourWinds, Jul 31, 2003, 12:39)
- Re: Sacred Landscapes (nigelswift, Jul 31, 2003, 22:15)
- a cognitive theory of the sacred (TomBo, Jan 20, 2004, 01:03)
|
|