The Modern Antiquarian. Stone Circles, Ancient Sites, Neolithic Monuments, Ancient Monuments, Prehistoric Sites, Megalithic MysteriesThe Modern Antiquarian
Home Latest Posts Forums Maps Help
Browse Sites News Blog Contributors The Books
Head To Head   The Modern Antiquarian   General Discussion Forum Start a topic | Search
The Modern Antiquarian
Re: but...
120 messages
Select a forum:
tjj wrote:
That is all I have to say on the matter as I am aware Hob is a highly esteemed contributor.

Eeh, in't you nice to say that ;) I'm just a distant memory here, due to not posting hardly ever these days.

tjj wrote:
Am genuinely perplexed by these double standards.

It's sort of different in this case as the outcrop in question was completely unmarked, and is a good 500m away from the next nearest real cupmark. No way in hell would I ever condone marking on already marked rocks. There's one like that at Lordenshaw, dating back to the 1950s I think, and it's just not right.

tjj wrote:
If that view makes me an outcast on this forum ... well, no change there. I stand by my view.
Well now, it's not like you've suggested the romans tidied the landscape up nicely or anything as blasphemous...


Reply | with quote
Hob
Posted by Hob
1st October 2012ce
23:22

In reply to:

Re: but... (tjj)

Messages in this topic:

Terms & Conditions  |  Home  |  Julian Cope presents Head Heritage Top of page