StoneGloves wrote: "Blakey Topping is a natural hill, but from the right direction (including from the stone circle) it is very Silbury-esque".
That's the wrong way round, I think. Silbury is Blakey Topping-esque.
Ha ha! Yes, I wasn't suggesting that Blakey Topping was modelled on Silbury SG! Unless EH have got their dates very wrong.
Not sure what nomenclature you are suggesting though. Fossilised-Rainbow-Hills is a bit of a mouthful. :-)
Reply | with quote | Posted by thesweetcheat 5th June 2011ce 13:04 |
Prehistoric origins confirmed! (Littlestone, May 31, 2011, 10:02)- Re: Prehistoric origins confirmed! (goffik, May 31, 2011, 10:15)
- Re: Prehistoric origins confirmed! (Squid Tempest, May 31, 2011, 14:35)
- Re: Prehistoric origins confirmed! (Sanctuary, May 31, 2011, 17:49)
- Re: Prehistoric origins confirmed! (GLADMAN, May 31, 2011, 18:46)
- Re: Prehistoric origins confirmed! (Rhiannon, May 31, 2011, 20:09)
- Re: Prehistoric origins confirmed! (tomwatts, Jun 02, 2011, 22:49)
- Re: Prehistoric origins confirmed! (Vybik Jon, Jun 03, 2011, 08:25)
- Re: Prehistoric origins confirmed! (Littlestone, Jun 09, 2011, 07:35)
- Re: Prehistoric origins confirmed! (Littlestone, Jun 14, 2011, 04:14)
|
|