"Kennett council are looking into the landownership, which is probably David Hues. It does fall within the western tip of the West Kennett conservation area. They will check to see if the Environment agency needs to be contacted."
Good start Pete - nice one. Let's hope they keep it up!
love
Moth
Reply | with quote | Posted by Moth 23rd November 2004ce 19:35 |
Silbaby -a plea. (nigelswift, Nov 23, 2004, 08:25)- Re: Silbaby -a plea. (jimit, Nov 23, 2004, 08:29)
- Re: Silbaby -a plea. (Jane, Nov 23, 2004, 09:08)
- Re: Silbaby -a plea. (StoneLifter, Nov 23, 2004, 09:16)
- Re: Silbaby -a plea. (smallblueplanet, Nov 23, 2004, 09:42)
- Re: Silbaby -a plea. (Rhiannon, Nov 23, 2004, 10:02)
- Re: Silbaby -a plea. (Rhiannon, Nov 23, 2004, 10:39)
- Silbaby on TMA (TMA Ed, Nov 23, 2004, 11:55)
- Waden hill (Pete G, Nov 23, 2004, 13:37)
- Re: Waden hill (Moth, Nov 23, 2004, 14:46)
- Re: Waden hill (nigelswift, Nov 23, 2004, 15:05)
- Update (Pete G, Nov 23, 2004, 16:35)
- grid ref (Rhiannon, Nov 23, 2004, 16:38)
- Re: Update (Moth, Nov 23, 2004, 19:35)
- Re: Waden hill? (Kammer, Nov 23, 2004, 16:16)
- Re: Waden hill (StoneLifter, Nov 23, 2004, 15:05)
- Re: Waden hill (Kammer, Nov 23, 2004, 16:20)
- Re: Silbaby on TMA (Moth, Nov 23, 2004, 14:34)
- Re: Silbaby -a plea. (jimit, Nov 23, 2004, 16:24)
- Silbaby - a suggestion. (Kammer, Nov 23, 2004, 17:16)
- More evidence? (ocifant, Nov 23, 2004, 20:55)
- West Kennett enclosures (Rhiannon, Nov 25, 2004, 13:57)
- Re: Silbaby -a plea. (BrigantesNation, Nov 26, 2004, 15:20)
- Council reply (Pete G, Nov 26, 2004, 16:09)
- Re WK palisaded enclosures (moss, Nov 28, 2004, 07:32)
|
|