Aye.
Especially if Pete is willing to let the aerial photo be used.
At ground level, Silbaby does look like an extreme enigma, but that shot really shows up the fact that there's something there worthy of serious investigation.
Reply | with quote | Posted by Hob 23rd November 2004ce 16:21 |
Silbaby -a plea. (nigelswift, Nov 23, 2004, 08:25)- Re: Silbaby -a plea. (jimit, Nov 23, 2004, 08:29)
- Re: Silbaby -a plea. (Jane, Nov 23, 2004, 09:08)
- Re: Silbaby -a plea. (StoneLifter, Nov 23, 2004, 09:16)
- Re: Silbaby -a plea. (smallblueplanet, Nov 23, 2004, 09:42)
- Re: Silbaby -a plea. (Rhiannon, Nov 23, 2004, 10:02)
- Re: Silbaby -a plea. (Rhiannon, Nov 23, 2004, 10:39)
- Silbaby on TMA (TMA Ed, Nov 23, 2004, 11:55)
- Waden hill (Pete G, Nov 23, 2004, 13:37)
- Re: Waden hill (Moth, Nov 23, 2004, 14:46)
- Re: Waden hill (nigelswift, Nov 23, 2004, 15:05)
- Update (Pete G, Nov 23, 2004, 16:35)
- Re: Waden hill? (Kammer, Nov 23, 2004, 16:16)
- Re: Waden hill? (Hob, Nov 23, 2004, 16:21)
- Re: Waden hill (StoneLifter, Nov 23, 2004, 15:05)
- Re: Waden hill (Kammer, Nov 23, 2004, 16:20)
- Re: Silbaby on TMA (Moth, Nov 23, 2004, 14:34)
- Re: Silbaby -a plea. (jimit, Nov 23, 2004, 16:24)
- Silbaby - a suggestion. (Kammer, Nov 23, 2004, 17:16)
- More evidence? (ocifant, Nov 23, 2004, 20:55)
- West Kennett enclosures (Rhiannon, Nov 25, 2004, 13:57)
- Re: Silbaby -a plea. (BrigantesNation, Nov 26, 2004, 15:20)
- Council reply (Pete G, Nov 26, 2004, 16:09)
- Re WK palisaded enclosures (moss, Nov 28, 2004, 07:32)
|
|