I'm sorry

close
more_vert

geoffrey_prime wrote:
Should millionaires be asked to work for free? or work expense-free?Perhaps we should try an recruit more and more millionaires into public service, working for free, to help us get public sector spending back under control.
Sorry if people seem a bit irrational on the subject of MPs expenses Geoffrey. Maybe they've got too sensitive lately.

They are so silly. It isn't as if an MP, knighted by her most gracious majesty and Chair and Director of banking, oil, hotels, textiles, pharmaceuticals and venture capital companies has just been exposed as having claimed and received £1,650 to buy a floating island for his fecking ducks!

Hey Nigel, I agree, people making these ridiculous claims should be booted out. I am amazed that the claims office has repeatedly failed to recognise the claims which are clearly outside the rules or "spirit of the rules".
That said, whilst I think that it would be sensible now to re-think the support (through expenses) for MP's who need a second home to perform their duties, I would not condemn politicians, wealthy or otherwise, for claiming the very basic expenses, such as on mortgage interest, under the current rules. There should have been very careful monitoring of "flipping" homes...and Capital Gains Tax should have been paid on a sale of a second home.
Also, I fail to see why the Inland Revenue haven't been taking a much closer look at MP's expenses and tax liabilities over recent years.