close
more_vert

Fuel cells are not an energy producer but a storage device. As you say you need the sun (or whatever) to charge them. They are not efficient.

Even the oil companies are admitting to low reserves now in industry magazines and papers.

The short term problem is not oil supply, but *cheap* oil. Then supply probelms kick in at a later date.

There is not enough investment in renewable energy. One of the most promising schemes in the UK (up north somewhere) was shut last year because the gov't wouldn't give them £10m, but could spend hundreds of millions on a war for oil. Go figure.

How do you smelt metals etc. to make new wind-turbines when all the fossil fuel has gone?

By the same token oil is not an energy supply but an energy storage device -- sun shines on earth, plants grow, animals eat plants, they die and sink into the bog to be dug up a million laters as "oil."

It all basically boils down to solar power, one way or another.

I am totally in agreement with you on investing in renewable and "alternative" energy sources.

I also have a lot of faith in technology to make things like fuel cells cost-effective (duh, otherwise why invest in developing them?)

Just think what technology has done for the world in the last 100 years . . . and if anything the pace of tech development is INCREASING . . . .