close
more_vert

grufty jim wrote:
I don't think you appreciate what the BNP are, handofdave. They are not like the Republicans in the US. That'd be the Conservatives, who are not 'marginalised'. Indeed they are likely to be the next British government.

The BNP are more like the Ku Klux Klan. Which is why any rise in their support is a real concern.

But are they actually seeing a rise in support?

I should add that the KKK and it's equivalents in the USA are Republicans, for the most part, and tho that parties official line on racism is 'it's bad', they tacitly encourage hatred of nonwhites by giving a wink and a nod to the racists, as evidenced by the tone of the GOP rallies in the last election, where Sarah Palin was given free reign to whip up the mob with talk of Obama being a 'Kenyan terrorist' and the like.

Perhaps what's different about here and over there is that most of the fascist-leaning types in the USA have learned to be more careful about their language in public forums. Amongst themselves they still retain the same old language and attitudes they always have had.

What's better... to have the fascists come right out and be who they are, without apology, or disguise their real intentions?

I've heard some black folks say that they'd rather live down south, where the racism is overt, and unmistakeable, than live up north, where it's still present, but masked. Know thine enemy.

In other words, let the fascists make themselves known. That way there's no second guessing who's who. Don't let them go underground... drag them out into the light and show everyone what they're really about. Don't let them disguise themselves in more 'moderate' clothing.

I expect that the BNP is NOT going to get more support from Griffin being on this show. Instead, it's opened up a wider dialog about why the BNP is wrong. Just as it has right here on this forum.

The best bullwark against the BNP is a Labour party that reconnects with the Labour movement and the needs of the blue collar worker and a Tory party that is honest about the views of the rump of its supporters and doesn't pretend they are a blue shade of New Labour Lite.

It is also worth keeping in mind that the people with most to gain from a bump in BNP numbers are the far left. These are two sets of discredited parasites who feed off of eachother to the massive disinterest of the wider population. I take anything that the far left says about the far right and vice versa with a massive pinch of salt.

The analogy of the BNP being the same as the US republican party is very weak though. I may be out of touch but I don't think the Republican Party would say; that NY is no longer an American city nor that the only true Americans are those who can say their ancestors lived on US soil just after the last ice age, or that all immigrants should be sent home. Cos, well, in a US context it would be quite silly really. Yep,it's quite silly here too,but we're dealing with European Fascism, it's very different. I've never heard of an anti-jewish holocaust denying Republican.

I know you have those minutemen loonies down on the mexican border, I reckon they're about the closest to our BNP in political terms. Of course our BNP have all manner of additional unpleasant opinions,such as homophobia (very Republican true). It's also true what Ian said about the Tory rank and file having similar opinions to the BNP. However, it is much more likely that a Tory who feels disenfranchised in Camerons new (no, it isn't new tbh) Tory Party to vote for UKIP before they would vote BNP.

What I'm saying is painting all right-wing parties as being the same is really, really fucking dumb. You just end up validating, and legitimising a lot of policies and ideas that you really, really don't need to. Grufty is correct, this is about legitimising that which we cannot afford to, especially at this time where polarisation is creating traction for extremists. Mind you, if the BNP did enact their no immigration, send em all home, policy this country would be royally fucked into an unrecoverable situation economically.

The Tory party is already legitimising a few facist parties in Europe by working with them in the EU group they're part of. This, this is the problem here. The rise of fascist groups (as opposed to the normal right wing parties) is a european wide problem. It's also a problem in Russia too. The anti-islamic feeling even in Denmark has gone completely over the top, the violence there at the moment is horrifying and the state and the police are completely out of line.

Know thine enemy, move down south cos the racism there is overt and therefore visible. FFS. That is a terrifyingly stupid argument.

Anyhow, the Anti fascist groups here in the UK can be happily relied upon to beat the living crap out of BNP members and supporters when it comes to the point that it will be required. Same is true in a lot of other European countries , but not all of Europe unfortunately.

handofdave wrote:
But are they actually seeing a rise in support?
30 years ago the BNP (or the organisation they evolved from) were little more than skinhead football hooligans with a fanzine. They occasionally assaulted non-whites when superior numbers were on their side and broke a lot of Asian-owned shop windows in certain parts of the country. Once in a while they'd vandalise a curry house or Chinese takeaway for variety.

20 years ago, when I first moved to the UK and encountered them, they were more organised. Rallies, benefit gigs, proper membership scheme and visions of members standing for election. I can vividly recall the anti-fascist actions I went on as the 80s gave way to the 90s and watching as the racists started to don suits and pretend to be reasonable.

10 years ago they started winning the occasional seat in local elections. There was always a big media furore about it, and they inevitably lost the seat again. Nick Griffin was invited to the Oxford Union debate society and he slowly but surely (and with no little buffoonery) started to remove offensively racist language from the BNPs public pronouncements. He started talking about "the indigenous people of these islands" rather than "white people". Nonsense on so many levels, but it appears there are those who get taken in by it.

Because this year's elections saw the BNP secure two seats in the European Parliament and a seat on the London Assembly plus close to 80 council seats nationwide. On top of that, the Minister for Justice and senior opposition politicians are now willing to sit down and debate with them in front of a mass audience. And according to the first poll carried out after the broadcast of Question Time, it has increased support for the BNP. Or rather, it has helped increase the number of those who would now "consider voting BNP" to 22%.

So in answer to your question, "are they actually seeing a rise in support?" Yes they are. Very, very clearly.

What's worse is that the kind of racist scape-goating that the BNP peddle has historically flourished in times of economic hardship. And given that we are going to have to deal with Climate Change and resource depletion over the next 30 years, this is something that should concern us.

I want to reply to the rest of your post too but I've got to head out for a few hours. Later.

handofdave wrote:
But are they actually seeing a rise in support?
As already established, yes they are.

handofdave wrote:
I should add that the KKK and it's equivalents in the USA are Republicans, for the most part, and tho that parties official line on racism is 'it's bad', they tacitly encourage hatred of nonwhites by giving a wink and a nod to the racists, as evidenced by the tone of the GOP rallies in the last election, where Sarah Palin was given free reign to whip up the mob with talk of Obama being a 'Kenyan terrorist' and the like.
I can only echo stray's sentiments on this. To fail to see the difference between mainstream rightwing politics and fascism is not merely bizarre, it's genuinely dangerous. Thanks to the US's 2-party system, it makes perfect sense that the KKK and the Far Right would vote Republican. Just as I'm fairly sure that Farrakhan's Nation of Islam followers all voted for Obama. Are we to assume they represent your views, handofdave. As an Obama-voter do you feel a kinship with them?

"All KKK vote Republican" is not the same thing as "All Republicans have KKK sympathies". Having lived in the States I've met numerous republican voters, to label them all as being members of the racist rightwing is fantastically insulting and just plain wrong. For a start, my cousin's best friend is a staunch Republican. He's also black. I guess you'd say he was what, "self-hating"? What about Condoleeza Rice, Alan Greenspan and Colin Powell? I'm not suggesting they demonstrate that the Republican Party are 100% non-racist, but are you suggesting that the KKK have appointed black and jewish people into prominent positions in their organisations?

Just because some Republicans are racist does not make centre-right politics inherently racist. No more than Farrakhan's support of Obama implies that the Democrats share his position.

handofdave wrote:
Perhaps what's different about here and over there is that most of the fascist-leaning types in the USA have learned to be more careful about their language in public forums. Amongst themselves they still retain the same old language and attitudes they always have had.
No. The fascist-leaning types in the USA are not careful about their language. Ever encounter a KKK member? How "careful" is StormFront magazine about it's language? Ever trawled some of the US neo-Nazi messageboards? Not much "care" being taken there.

handofdave wrote:
What's better... to have the fascists come right out and be who they are, without apology, or disguise their real intentions?

I've heard some black folks say that they'd rather live down south, where the racism is overt, and unmistakeable, than live up north, where it's still present, but masked. Know thine enemy.

Then those folks are not only black, they're idiots. They'd really rather live somewhere their kids will be openly abused and even risk being lynched for their skin colour, than somewhere their kids will face disguised racism? Do you really know people who've said that?

When I moved to London in the late 80s my Irish accent drew the occasional look of contempt. When my Dad spent time there in the 60s he passed guesthouses and pubs with signs saying "No dogs, no blacks, no Irish" on the door. What sort of masochistic Irishman wants to go back to that? And what sort of idiot suggests they'd rather live in that environment?

Subtle, disguised racism is still vile and needs to be opposed and eradicated. But it's a damn sight better than being in constant fear of being beaten up, or worse, because of your accent or skin colour.

handofdave wrote:
In other words, let the fascists make themselves known. That way there's no second guessing who's who. Don't let them go underground... drag them out into the light and show everyone what they're really about.
The fascists already have made themselves known. They are regularly interviewed in the media, get to make their own broadcasts on the BBC, have a website, literature, meetings you can attend, merchandise you can buy from their shop. They're not underground.

handofdave wrote:
Don't let them disguise themselves in more 'moderate' clothing.
What? You mean like invite them on mainstream political debate shows and give them the opportunity to appear more moderate than they are?

handofdave wrote:
I expect that the BNP is NOT going to get more support from Griffin being on this show.
Well, I expect you're wrong about that. They've already received a minor bump in the polls. But the problem is about the longterm legitimising of their position within politics and this programme was just one tiny step along that path. But make no mistake, however small it was, it was definitely a step.

handofdave wrote:
Instead, it's opened up a wider dialog about why the BNP is wrong. Just as it has right here on this forum.
We don't need a dialogue about the wrongness of the BNP. We simply need to examine the historical record of fascism and ethnic nationalism. Once you've done that, you realise that the best thing to do with fascists is oppose them at every turn and refuse to allow them to take even tiny steps towards legitimacy.