BBC 'HAD ENOUGH'

close
more_vert

handofdave wrote:
I really have no damn use for 'pedigree' anything. It leads to inbred royalty and grotesquely deformed animals...
Yes, our royals defo fit the grotesquely deformed animals description.

handofdave wrote:
I prefer good natured breeds of a medium to large size... small dogs usually annoy me. I want to punt them out the nearest window, usually.
A guy along the street has a rottweiler that squeezed out seven or eight pups the other year. Now we have five or so new owners of the damn things scattered too nearby for my liking. One a-hole lets it walk off lead.
I told him once I was scared to pass it by, and he was surprisingly ok about it, and grabbed it by the colar to let me pass. Usually dog onwers think you're an ignorant monster if you say such things about their pooches.

x

Yes, I have always wondered if Prince Harry qualifies as a genetic Royal, being that the only qualification required is that his genetic bloodline comes from Prince Charles only. However he may have an unassailable legal (not genetic) status as his Birth Certificate will have Charles as his father.

Back to the matter of diseased canines