Supporting the need for violence in the abstract doesnt mean supporting every actof pseudo-politcal violence. The prick with the fire extinguisher was a fucking prick, end of. Violence should, must, only be used when there is no alternative. But it is woefully naive, imho, to think that that situation will not, does not, crop up even in a 'democracy' like Britain. Just take a look at the history of Ireland and the 'brits' actions there. Or even there actions against (mainly) peaceful demonstrations such as the Poll Tax or last years anti-cuts demos.
If it is acceptable to use violence in Homs, when and where else does it become acceptable? We shouldnt - indeed we would be idiotic to - jump imeediately into 'insurectionary acts to spark the revolution' (which was what the RAF & John Brown did), but we must never forget that they will never, ever ever ever, give up their power of their own free will. If we want to achieve a fundamental change in society, it will take education, patience, discipline, love, AND, sadly, probably, violence.
And the modern International Brigade? Actually their have been quite a few, apparently. But they get thrown into Gitmo if anyone finds out.