Loughcrew Complex forum 11 room
Image by ryaner
close
more_vert

In Brennans book he claims the difference is only one and a half degree to the north, I've heard others say this is only one and a half to two diameters of the suns disc, Brennan says 'At Equinox the variation is so minimal that it need not be considered at all'.

Frank Prendergast has done a lot of work on alignments to solar events and more recently on other monuments, he recently claimed that only 10% of passage tombs in Ireland are potentially aligned on significant astronomical events. There's not a whole lot of coverage on Irish passage tombs in Clive Ruggles book unfortunately, though I did hear a rather bizarre claim that he regards concepts like the equinox as 'too abstract' for neolithic people. He does say in the book that dates for the equinoxes and cross-quarter days are meaningless unless you can get an exact date for the solstices, which he claims is near impossible using the structures he examines.
Brennan makes a very simple point in this regard, if you count the total days the suns shadow moves from one point to it's extreme, then back to it's original point and divide by two you should get the exact date.

Thom does some speculation with posts and the sun's shadow. The north-south line can have been accurately calculated this way certainly. I don't trust Ruggles' stuff at all. He approaches as a sceptic and discounts errors that could only be measured with modern equipment. The equinoxes are floating points between the two solstices, really, and can't have altered position much, consequently. The amount of significance given to the equinox versus the solstice would be, perhaps, Easter as against Christmas. Thom suggested that the year was anciently split into 1/16ths, which he deduced from statistical alignments. Great work, incidentally!

CianMcLiam wrote:
In Brennans book he claims the difference is only one and a half degree to the north, I've heard others say this is only one and a half to two diameters of the suns disc, Brennan says 'At Equinox the variation is so minimal that it need not be considered at all'.

Frank Prendergast has done a lot of work on alignments to solar events and more recently on other monuments, he recently claimed that only 10% of passage tombs in Ireland are potentially aligned on significant astronomical events. There's not a whole lot of coverage on Irish passage tombs in Clive Ruggles book unfortunately, though I did hear a rather bizarre claim that he regards concepts like the equinox as 'too abstract' for neolithic people. He does say in the book that dates for the equinoxes and cross-quarter days are meaningless unless you can get an exact date for the solstices, which he claims is near impossible using the structures he examines.
Brennan makes a very simple point in this regard, if you count the total days the suns shadow moves from one point to it's extreme, then back to it's original point and divide by two you should get the exact date.

Ruggles has modified his view on the equinoxes and is coming round to accepting them .