Re: Heymonheyehgorrennypikchaz? | Forum

Toor 1

Heymonheyehgorrenny pikchaz?

more_vert

ryaner Sep 11, 2006 22:42:25

Replying to Hob

Hob wrote:

That photo can't be the stone described, surely?

(Or rather it could, but the description could be a severe case of over-imagination.)

The item doesn't give a site-visit date so it could be a dubious entry, culled from other sources. It does say "At least…" so who knows? I came across these the other day:
http://www.themodernantiquarian.com/site/8769
and they're not even mentioned in the book.

Andy

Hob Sep 11, 2006 23:27:01

Replying to ryaner

I noticed that one when you posted, and meant to comment on the burial/RA thing. There's a lot of that about. Could be worth checking stones around other burial mounds in the area.

So does that count as a new find? In which case: 'Rah! :)