Lubin wrote:
The other bit I thought was pushing it a bit was when they found the flint on top of the mound and straight way said it was a Neolithic mound. The mound had been under flowing water for well over a hundred years. What was to have stopped it being carried there by the current?
Phil's obsession with flint makes me smile. Crack a sherd of flint off and depending how it breaks away it can look just like a cutting tool of the Neolithic but in fact brand new. How do they tell the difference? Lubin
