Stonehenge and its Environs forum 134 room
Image by Mr Hamhead
close
more_vert

God yes George.

It came up in one or two discussions in a well known society on facebook: The posts asking the question get deleted or the threads get closed. Where I've found archaeo sites that try to address value, there's no wish to engage with justifying why value is assigned (and sometimes people get very annoyed that the question is being asked). Even the Portal, on the few threads that it's been brought up on, doesn't get a huge response. Interesting thread that one because it happened over a number of years and we managed to predict what would happen to the discipline (how it would get hit).

I think that people assume that you're a troll if you ask for justification of 'importance'. Until this point, I don't think that anyone has had to think about it. I'm not convinced that anyone is now.

All the best

Jon

Jon, you implied that there were plenty of examples but didn't provide any .

Archaeologists or other interested parties may sigh when asked "why archaeological remains have value to humanity. " , but I can't see how they would be reluctant to respond .

jonmor wrote:
Until this point, I don't think that anyone has had to think about it. I'm not convinced that anyone is now.
On the contrary, it has been thought about extensively for many years and I think you do a lot of people a disservice if you think otherwise. I suggest you read some conservation documents - the Burra Charter and the UNESCO Convention for a start, and then English Heritage's guidance on the setting of heritage assets and Historic England's Historic Environment Note 2 and the recent draft for discussion, Note 3.

It's impossible to make conservation choices without employing mechanisms for assessing significance and that's what happens every day.