Stonehenge and its Environs forum 134 room
Image by RiotGibbon
close

...Because moonlight simply isn't good enough...

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-15934993

...I can imagine the trenches they'd have to dig to lay the power cables....

Oh.... and a service road...

head-first wrote:
...Because moonlight simply isn't good enough...

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-15934993

Oh no! Please not. I haven't yet experienced the stars 'drawing down' at Stonehenge but hope to one day.

I like what the NT have done at Fountains Abbey...perhaps every stone could be a different colour? or have adverts projected onto them? or travel news for passing motorists?

To keep you star gazers happy they could erect a giant dome over the whole sit and project the stars onto it like the planitarium...that way they could charge for entry at night as well....think of the extra revenue EH?

Mr H

Fecking appaling idea. Why not astro-turf it and bung in a Harvester and a play-area for good measure.

Soulless cretins.

They've just said this on Twitter:

@EnglishHeritage wrote:
We do look after Stonehenge, and there are no plans to light it at night - interesting debate though!
G x

head-first wrote:
...Because moonlight simply isn't good enough...

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-15934993

How many nights is Stonehenge -or any other British monument- actually moon- or starlit? Loie and I have had two Private Visits to Stonehenge. Our Sunrise visit was too cloudy to see the sun at all, although watching the diffuse light grow was pleasant. On our Sunset Visit, it teemed rain so hard that after twenty minutes we two were the only visitors remaining. We had a nice chat with the night guard.

But what would be the point of Illuminating Stonehenge? Isn't the walkway closed at night?

As for dark night skies, most of today's problems are caused much more by bad lighting practices and humidity than by smoky pollution. That wasn't true during, say, the Sixties in places like Los Angeles. ****That**** pollution I saw. Yuck. For example, here in north central Maryland, East Coast Megalopolis, we have fairly dark skies in the winter. We can see the Milky Way perfectly well. It was visible last night.

But during the humid summer, our southern sky is a dome of orange glow as we look toward Westminster and the Baltimore and Washington suburbs. Dark Sky Compliant out door lighting would eliminate most of that light pollution.

I like the strobe RAF lighting technique.

http://farm2.staticflickr.com/1276/4672504186_d4d6d4d9a1_b.jpg

Its perhaps a way forward.

But blink and you'll miss it.

head-first wrote:
...Because moonlight simply isn't good enough...

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-15934993

Any idea they come up with to get more folk to visit Stonehenge is fine by me if it keeps them away from Avebury!! I still can't understand why Stonehenge has become such a much bigger draw compared to the Complex but hope it stays that way!

Bloody flippin' no. That's something only the tasteless Americans would do.

How come it would be wrong at Stonehenge whereas here (to me anyway) it looks fine?

http://www.englishheritageimages.com/salisbury_cathedral_at_night_aa083369/print/1364733.html

"Every generation gets the Stonehenge it deserves - and desires."

Jacquetta Hawkes


;-)

I think it's a great idea!!! It would look lovely if it was floodlit. So atmospheric. I don't see what the problem would be and the countless tourists who visit would truly love it. After all, we are the main people who pay the money to have sites like this maintained. It's a superb idea. :)

head-first wrote:
...Because moonlight simply isn't good enough...

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-15934993

Why illuminating Stonehenge is an unenlightened idea.
Comment from the Guardian;

On the roads;.. "it is only the neolithic and bronze age remains, spattered like grapeshot across the white spaces of an Ordnance Survey sheet, that break this uncompromising geometry."

With Ian Vince on this one. We are.........


"in comparison to the builders of places like Stonehenge – intuitively dim. Lighting up those stones, introducing a few more lux of light pollution, will only make us marginally dimmer, more disconnected from the celestial calendars that Stonehenge, in all probability, was constructed to observe. This, as any sane observer of our insane treatment of the environment knows, is exactly the wrong way to go."


http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2011/dec/05/stonehenge-illuminating