Stonehenge and its Environs forum 134 room
Image by RiotGibbon
close
more_vert

Hiya Gordon

I suppose it's entirely possible that there ARE lots more houses than were discovered or supposed, but even so - did all of them have to be involved in the building of Stonehenge?

I mean - we are kind of supposing that every single inhabitant had a hand in the transportation and erection of the stones. It's just as possible that however many (or few) people you think could erect Stonehenge did so while the other inhabitants did other things. Or just watched. ;)

Who knows, eh? :)

G x

Hi Goffick

How are you keeping? I think PP called the remains workers homes because they were different from the usual remains. Just somewhere for the workers to sleep I suppose.

But you are quite right most of the local population would have had plenty to do without lugging bloody great stones about. The earliest farmers must have practised a type of "slash and burn" farming, clearing new land on a regular basis. To say nothing of making every scrap of clothing by hand, ploughing the new land with nothing more than a sharpened stick and a reluctance Ox, making bread, stone axes, spears, bows and arrows (Neolithic man would still have done a bit of hunting) and who knows what else they would have had to do.

I think it is unlikely that they could have spared more than 10% of the fittest men for the job on a full time basis.