Stonehenge and its Environs 134
Image by RiotGibbon

it is mentioned more here:

http://www.netcomuk.co.uk/~brianj/bluestones59.html

doesn't really make much more sense, it's just longer.

sam

Hmmmm...although there's a couple of simple errors in the report, I can't really see what this bollox of 'sloppily written' and other antagonisms are towards the idea. It's just an idea after all. Not sure if I buy it misself, so what's the problem? Offending some long-held beliefs or summat? Or just giving some of you summat to criticise as usual?