Stonehenge and its Environs 134
Image by moss

Having just actually read the article, it's so sloppily written that I can't even really get any proper impression of why they think it's good evidence....

Anyone seen the item covered properly anywhere?

love

Moth

it is mentioned more here:

http://www.netcomuk.co.uk/~brianj/bluestones59.html

doesn't really make much more sense, it's just longer.

sam

It's very sloppily written, and while not having read the original source material it seems like an example of someone, or some group (in this case a geologist or a group of geologists at the Open University), trying to make a quick 'academic' buck.