Lewis and Harris forum 14 room
Image by Zeb
close
more_vert

The alternatives are... what, exactly?
There was an article in last Saturday's Guardian about a family who'd installed the latest generation of solar panels - still horrendously expensive (something like £17,000 before various grants I think) but this family were effectively running their electricity meter backwards. The energy supplier the family was with didn't like that so they charged them some sort of cover charge :-( Moral of the story? The energy suppliers don't want us to go energy efficient - why would they when they want to make money from us, not pay us for producing not only our own energy needs but actually feeding what we don't need into the national grid.

If this 'government' really was a government it would insist that every new house had solar panels fitted as a matter of course. Why doesn't it?

Littlestone wrote:
this family were effectively running their electricity meter backwards.
Fantastic!

Shame the suppliers couldn't see the potential advantages of customers who put back into the grid. Maybe there's hope in that direction.

I'm glad iffy windfarms are being rejected. All I read about the recently rejected application for the windfarm up by Duddo stone circle, indicated that the company responsible was not only 'just in it for the money' (They are a business, so whaddya expect?), but that they had a track record of rather crap windfarms on the continent, so that they'd turned to the UK as somewhere they might get away with the same tricks.

Personally, I like the idea of wave/tidal power.