Lewis and Harris forum 14 room
Image by drewbhoy
close
more_vert

but like Jane says we have to face up to the question of climate change, who is going to make the change?
Whatever alternative energies we go for, ALL have SOME impact. The question is which one has the LEAST impact. Wind? Wave? Sure isn't coal/gas/oil/nuclear.

I, for one, want electricity for my washing machine, computer, TV, DVD, lighting, cooker, fridge and hairdryer. And I'd like it to be as carbon neutrally produced as poss. If that means wind turbines, I STILL say bring 'em on.

The alternatives are... what, exactly?

This is interesting reading
http://www.countryguardian.net/The%20Case%20Against%20Wind%20%27Farms%27.pdf

The alternatives are... what, exactly?
There was an article in last Saturday's Guardian about a family who'd installed the latest generation of solar panels - still horrendously expensive (something like £17,000 before various grants I think) but this family were effectively running their electricity meter backwards. The energy supplier the family was with didn't like that so they charged them some sort of cover charge :-( Moral of the story? The energy suppliers don't want us to go energy efficient - why would they when they want to make money from us, not pay us for producing not only our own energy needs but actually feeding what we don't need into the national grid.

If this 'government' really was a government it would insist that every new house had solar panels fitted as a matter of course. Why doesn't it?