Re: Little Stone Goddess | Forum — The Modern Antiquarian

little stone goddess Oct 19, 2004 13:17:20

Replying to daveyravey

Right, I've posted two images

http://www.themodernantiquarian.com/post/32697

and

http://www.themodernantiquarian.com/post/32697

There are some markings on her that don't come out in the photograph, but they're very faint. There may be the groove of a fingernail, too.

After having her for a few months, I'm sure that she was meant to be held - she's just the right size and shape; also I think she's to do with the weather.

I don't want to take her to a museum because I feel that she is domestic, and if she has any secrets to reveal it will be in a domestic setting, with family, cooking, gardening and pets and not a museum case.

Little Stone Goddess

little stone goddess Oct 19, 2004 13:20:48

Replying to little stone goddess

Sorry, the other link is

http://www.themodernantiquarian.com/post/32696

Pete G Oct 19, 2004 13:21:18

Replying to little stone goddess

hmm, looks like clinker to me, I cannot see a Goddess figure for the life of me.
Pete(the skeptic)G

Kammer Oct 19, 2004 15:35:02

Replying to little stone goddess

Hi LSG,

> I don't want to take her to a museum because I feel that
> she is domestic...

Surely it'd be worth it though, if only to find out if she/it is what you think she/it is. If it really is a goddess figure then you've got something extremely special.

To be honest, the photos you've posted are a bit... how do I put this tactfully... blurred. It's hard to see what the object is. Sorry if this sounds negative, but I'd be genuinely interested to see the detail on the object.

K x