Stonehenge forum 180 room
Image by Chance
close
more_vert

spencer wrote:
Irresppective of whether Stonehenge was a case in point, and with reference to the comment below about hearing the sound of drumming coming from WKLB, the hypothesis that our forebears created, on occasion, places with a deliberate auditory element to them, or utilised caves and other geological features with that facility remains valid. They were very probably greater sensualists than we are, to our detriment, appreciating what the natural world had to offer, be it sound or visual, for example auroras or the sun and moons reflections in water filled cup or bullaun stones. We should recognise, appreciate and respect that, and not deride.
Nice comment Spencer but don't think anyone here was deriding the use of sound, perhaps just the use of Stonehenge, yet again, to promote personal theories and agendas. To quote the BBC piece "There are many questions surrounding the ancient stone circle of Stonehenge but might sound help in the search for answers?" The answer is clearly no because Stonehenge is a ruin and no one really knows what it originally looked like or what it was used for. The closest I get in drawing comparisons with what we know today are the great cathedrals and certain churches. Built to worship the God of the time but also amazing acoustic places for sound, song and certain music (such as choral performances). Amazing architecture and human achievement too.

Quite , the derision was not only for the over interpretation from Rupe but more importantly the errors in his understanding , that were highlighted at the time , and if anyone wants a summary can easily be repeated .
Bruno Fazenda who works in the same area is an example of someone who doesn't make the same errors, knows his stuff and also doesn't over interpret . He doesn't go out of his way to self publicise or flog dodgy apps either .

I was not saying that anyone here was deriding, June. I was expressing a personal opinion, perhaps not as surgically precise as others may like, the kernel of which was that our forebears, in the absence of the technology of the modern age, were perhaps more aware of and in tune with their environment..probably no bad thing. I had not, repeat not, read 'Rupe', nor any comments generated in response, as was incorrectly assumed. I prefer to assume nothing. My opinion was purely prompted by the initial post, and I had not read the link within. I hope that this is now perfectly clear - it really should be - and will say nothing more on the matter.