Stonehenge forum 180 room
Image by Chance
Stonehenge

Stonehenge is second hand

close
more_vert
tiompan T
tiompan Dec 15, 2015 01:04:50
Replying to nigelswift

All they have done is respond to the MPP paper , in effect a straw man .
They have not shown anything to support glacial entrainment at the site or that rock removal did not take place .
At one time it was suggested by one geomorphologist that the "proto orthostat " had arrived at it's situation perfectly naturally ,if this was so and it was worth using, then the removal of that rock , or anything similar , to a distance anywhere from 100 metres to 150 miles would never have been noticed by the three g/g's .

E Evergreen Dazed
Evergreen Dazed Dec 15, 2015 14:09:37
Replying to tiompan

tiompan wrote:
At one time it was suggested by one geomorphologist that the "proto orthostat " had arrived at it's situation perfectly naturally ,if this was so and it was worth using, then the removal of that rock , or anything similar , to a distance anywhere from 100 metres to 150 miles would never have been noticed by the three g/g's .
An extremely good point and one which should give pause for thought.
In fact, observations of a similar nature very obviously did, and the censorship driven by aforementioned hubris put an end to any reasonable discussion on that blog site.