All they have done is respond to the MPP paper , in effect a straw man .
They have not shown anything to support glacial entrainment at the site or that rock removal did not take place .
At one time it was suggested by one geomorphologist that the "proto orthostat " had arrived at it's situation perfectly naturally ,if this was so and it was worth using, then the removal of that rock , or anything similar , to a distance anywhere from 100 metres to 150 miles would never have been noticed by the three g/g's .