Sanctuary wrote:
Dave1982 wrote:
Well, perhaps not excavation, but non-intrusive scans would be interesting. I wonder how much that would cost? Mmmmm.
Worth considering? Any info on companies that do archaeological scans?
http://www.waterdowsing.co.uk/archaeology%20dowsing.htm
If he can show that he is capable of finding anything that nobody would be expected to find without dowsing then it's worth testing at Stonehenge .
But I doubt that he would be up for a test .
Anyone could go to Stonehenge with or without knowledge of the site and suggest that there are pits , cremations , buried stones , Anglo Saxon coins ,Victorian bottle tops and there is a possibility they might be right or close .If a dowser did the same it doesn't mean it was due to dowsing . Finding previously unrecorded archaeology in an area where none might be expected is done all the time by non dowsers and non detectorists on a daily basis .If dowsers could show , even that ability they might get accepted and it would be a start ,but they haven't
