Stonehenge 181
Image by Hob

Dave1982 wrote:
Well, perhaps not excavation, but non-intrusive scans would be interesting. I wonder how much that would cost? Mmmmm.

Any info on companies that do archaeological scans?

Worth considering?
http://www.waterdowsing.co.uk/archaeology%20dowsing.htm

Sanctuary wrote:
Dave1982 wrote:
Well, perhaps not excavation, but non-intrusive scans would be interesting. I wonder how much that would cost? Mmmmm.

Any info on companies that do archaeological scans?

Worth considering?
http://www.waterdowsing.co.uk/archaeology%20dowsing.htm
Worth testing elsewhere first , if he was willing .
If he can show that he is capable of finding anything that nobody would be expected to find without dowsing then it's worth testing at Stonehenge .
But I doubt that he would be up for a test .

Anyone could go to Stonehenge with or without knowledge of the site and suggest that there are pits , cremations , buried stones , Anglo Saxon coins ,Victorian bottle tops and there is a possibility they might be right or close .If a dowser did the same it doesn't mean it was due to dowsing . Finding previously unrecorded archaeology in an area where none might be expected is done all the time by non dowsers and non detectorists on a daily basis .If dowsers could show , even that ability they might get accepted and it would be a start ,but they haven't

Hi Sanctuary

Very worth considering, nice site too, but I’m afraid the establishment might be unkind about it. It could be done in secret early at dawn to avoid the establishment and permission requirements - but I have said to much already! I'll let you know more in due course. : )

Dave