Stonehenge forum 180 room
close
more_vert

Annexus Quam wrote:
Well, one shouldn't be so tough on them. I don't know who was personally involved but they knew the pits would be verified in the end once you make such an assertion. But if it was just for the publicity, then they certainly got it. I'm still open to any kind of claim, though.
Three unis involved in that claim .
I believe they deserve it . No problem with the existence of the pits but they are undated and unexcavated , one can't even be seen from the Heel Stone , in itself is a pretty imaginative use of "alignment " , but their calc is simply wrong in relation to the archaeoastronomy and the loony mid point procession /alignment easily refuted by primary school geometry ,at least that has been forgotten .

I remember that but just thought that the pits had been excavated and dated in the end by Mike Pitts. That's where the discussion in this thread seemed to end.

It sounds pretty serious then considering some uni's (and professors) were involved. Hah!

Ha ha. I remember that. Thought I'd refresh my memory on what this forum is about given recent 'discussions' (aka rants) on MP. The first post I saw starts with Hutton: An omen?