Stonehenge forum 180 room
close

Greetings neighbours

More evidence on Stonehenge you may be interested in

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-wiltshire-15917921

wychburyman wrote:
Greetings neighbours

More evidence on Stonehenge you may be interested in

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-wiltshire-15917921

Greetings,

Actually I did put a longer article on news about
this....http://www.themodernantiquarian.com/post/102712/news/stonehenge_and_its_environs.html


but if you read Tiompans comments on the subject, he says 'phooy' to the latest Stonehenge findings, they are way out. Still it is interesting and goes back to those postholes in the carpark as well.....
All I can say cynically is that if you do an archaeological survey anywhere near Stonehenge is that you have to justify it by an exciting headline ....

Mike Pitts requested the geofizz and evidence from the uni to review:

http://mikepitts.wordpress.com/2011/11/29/view-from-the-heelstone/

Okay, here's my theory.

Originally, the plan was to cover the south face of the Cursus' north bank with quartz, bright white chalk and shiny flint. A row of huge fires would be built in the Cursus at night, creating an Neolithic Son et Lumiere for the megalithic monument they were planning to build on Stonehenge's site.

But, the shaman's protested, claiming the heat of the fires would drive off the rain and clouds, thus allowing the proto-British people to actually SEE the stars for the first time. The shamans feared this awesome sight would convince their followers to become scientific astronomers, instead of shaman worshippers.

The Shaman Heritage Association nixed the Illumination plan after the first two fire pits had been tested, on the trumped-up grounds the fires would cause light pollution and frighten off the night-calling woodcocks.

Ah, what might have been?

wychburyman wrote:
Greetings neighbours

More evidence on Stonehenge you may be interested in

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-wiltshire-15917921

'The pits are positioned on celestial alignment at the site and may have contained stones, posts or fires to mark the rising and setting of the sun.'

Isn't that speculation, not evidence?