Don't worry - you are doing just fine. You have formally proposed a hypothesis in a secure form - a book - and that theory will be debated in the mainstream (eventually). Archaeologists wil only consider material from their peers ie. other archaeolologists. One of those will publish something derived from your work and they will then consider that (eventually). They all - well, the men, certainly - want a kick in the arse, and that's what the glacial erratic theory does.

Did your two pro bono review copies bear fruit on Amazon?