Stonehenge 181
Image by Moth
Stonehenge

Restoring Stonehenge

The Eternal T
The Eternal Jan 7, 2006 22:54:35
Replying to The Eternal

Oh, just re-read it, and realised you meant the existing fallen stones. Stupid me. I assume the imprint of the stones, that were discovered in the stone holes, show the correct position. The lintels can be assumed to rest on top, as per the existing lintels.
I stand corrected,
TE.

L Littlestone
Littlestone Jan 8, 2006 00:16:34
Replying to The Eternal

>I stand corrected<

Can we adopt that as the slogan for any re-erected stone ;-)

But you're quite right, I was thinking <i>only</i> of the fallen stones at Stonehenge, not the various 2 and 3-Dimensional reconstructions that have been done over the years for <i>all</i> the stones both present and missing.

The question was, has the original position for all of the fallen stones at Stonehenge been identified and has anyone attempted a computer/graphic reconstruction of how Stonehenge would look if those stones were back in their original positions?

© 2026 Head Heritage.

Unless otherwise stated, the copyright in each work is the property of the respective contributor. For usage or questions, contact [email protected].