Stonehenge forum 180 room
Image by The Eternal
close
more_vert

Great! PC sacrificing! Sounds good to me. There's a thought:

Could you sacrifice your virgin by offering her up - or rather, offering up her <i>lifetime</i> - to whatever god or goddess, then have her live a hermetical or similarly marked out existence . . . oh yeah, nuns. I forgot.

But on the whole, nuns have the choice. What if she was selected? Maybe she wouldn't live a hermetical life, maybe it would be more exalted, and deeply fuctional within the community. Would she become a seer, a medium between the worlds?

Or am I being amazingly obtuse and overlooking the sacrifice of the virginity bit? Doh!

However, surely you have to consider that life blood business. Surely the letting of human blood is the most symbolic act? What about the Aztecs and their bloody practices? Human sacrifice is suggested in the Bible - Genesis 22:2 <i>" Then God said, "Take your son, your only son, Isaac, whom you love, and go to the region of Moriah. Sacrifice him there as a burnt offering on one of the mountains I will tell you about."</i>

And would the spilling of human blood somehow equate (far back in time) with the menstrual cycle and birth as a result? And why are most sacrifical animals killed; surely this would not be necessary if you didn't have to kill to sacrifice?

I'm recalling Aleister Crowley's weird stuff. He had difficulties finding virgins (yet there are plenty in the Post Office - but I can't imagine him sorting letters for long).

The Heel Stone, at Stonehenge, was arbitrarily linked with blood sacrifices, if my memories are correct. There is that undercurrent of horror perceived at some sites. Blocked leys doesn't cover it.

It always struck me that virgin's blood could only be one thing, there is only one kind of blood she can shed only once. Yet in all my unborn years hymenal blood has never been brought up by any interested parties. Happy wisecraft hour.