Priddy Circles forum 6 room
Image by vulcan
Priddy Circles

Priddy Circles damage fine appropriate?

close
more_vert
Evergreen Dazed E
Evergreen Dazed Nov 26, 2012 16:25:18
Replying to juamei

juamei wrote:
Evergreen Dazed wrote:
Dear God, give me strength. I have not jumped to any 'assumption' at all.

I have stated that a full analysis of all facts in a court of law is the best way.

Evergreen Dazed wrote:
It may come as a disappointment to some here, but the truth is that it wasn't a maddened farmer, laughing insanely as he angrily bulldozed an ancient site.
It was a different scenario altogether.
???
What are the three question marks meant to be gifting us? Some incredible insight?

I'll try to interpret them.
I think you are attempting to say "But you've assumed this -"

If that is what you are saying then..

It is a fact that it WASN'T the farmer, laughing insanely whilst angrily bulldozing priddy.

Get it? Thats a fact.

J juamei
juamei Nov 26, 2012 16:42:02
Replying to Evergreen Dazed

Evergreen Dazed wrote:
juamei wrote:
Evergreen Dazed wrote:
Dear God, give me strength. I have not jumped to any 'assumption' at all.

I have stated that a full analysis of all facts in a court of law is the best way.

Evergreen Dazed wrote:
It may come as a disappointment to some here, but the truth is that it wasn't a maddened farmer, laughing insanely as he angrily bulldozed an ancient site.
It was a different scenario altogether.
???
What are the three question marks meant to be gifting us? Some incredible insight?

I'll try to interpret them.
I think you are attempting to say "But you've assumed this -"

If that is what you are saying then..

It is a fact that it WASN'T the farmer, laughing insanely whilst angrily bulldozing priddy.

Get it? Thats a fact.

My point was that you have made assumptions in your assessment of the case without the full facts. As have I. The difference is I acknowledge that fact. My annoyance was that you demanded facts and a basis for my assumptions whilst providing none yourself.