juamei wrote:
At work else I'd reply further, but tjj highlighted it perfectly.. Neither ED or TJJ know the full facts but have jumped to the assumption that he didn't do it with malice and that the penalty befits the crime. We are all working on the facts available as (I assume) none of us were in court.
Dear God, give me strength. I have not jumped to any 'assumption' at all.Its simple to me, will he pay enough to have the henge restored? If no, then he isn't paying enough.
I have stated that a full analysis of all facts in a court of law is the best way.
