Northumberland forum 23 room
Image by fitzcoraldo
close
more_vert

...there are now new hills formed where no hills existed before or at least not in human memory...
Yup.

It’s pointless getting into the artistic pros and cons of Slag Alice because there are as many different views on what is, and what is not, ‘artistic’ as there are on the merits and non merits of leaving votive offerings at megalithic sites (though most Stoneheads here will say don’t do it - don’t mess with the site).

So, taking another tack, surely we should avoid spoiling or even changing the landscape in the first place; but when, out of necessity, the landscape is spoilt or changed we then try to return it to what it was; that includes filling in and making good the open cast mine here - not exacerbating that change by creating a monstrous land figure. Interestingly, after decades of transport trauma, the new Hindhead Tunnel under the Devil’s Punch Bowl will achieve just that, “...especially as the old A3 route around the Devil’s Punch Bowl is to be dug up and returned to nature once the tunnel is fully open. David Kennington, manager of Surrey Hills for the National Trust, said: “This is a hugely important reconnection of the landscape. With its steep sides, the Devil’s Punch Bowl has become a national reserve, filled with heathland, streams and wildlife.” He stressed the importance of the wildlife around the punchbowl and how it is unique to this area.”

Note, ‘a hugely important reconnection of the landscape’ - surely that’s at the heart of the issue. Sadly, it’s too late for some changes ever to be reversed. Mount Rushmore was a sacred place to the Lakota Sioux until it fell foul to Western egotism; in fact it was known by the Sioux as the ‘Six Grandfathers’ and, “...was part of the route that the Lakota leader, Black Elk, took in a spiritual journey that culminated at Harney Peak”. No more though - now busts blasted into a once sacred hillside rule. More here.

We’re usually pretty good in this country when it comes to protecting our countryside. Not always though – small field systems, along with their hedgerows and ecosystems have been ripped up, while vast acres have been planted with coniferous, environmentally unfriendly, forests. It could be far, far worse however - re: the Karanpura Valley Destruction, whole mountains in Japan bulldozed flat for ‘development', dam projects in China which wreck eco systems and the surrounding landscape, decimation of the rain forests, etc etc. We don’t need to add to all that for the sake of claiming to have the largest ‘human earth figure in the world’... do we?

Littlestone wrote:
We’re usually pretty good in this country when it comes to protecting our countryside. Not always though – small field systems, along with their hedgerows and ecosystems have been ripped up, while vast acres have been planted with coniferous, environmentally unfriendly, forests.
The difficulty with this whole debate is that we live in surroundings that are almost entirely manmade. The small field systems that you mention were imposed by man on previously unenclosed open spaces. In some parts of the countryside, the action of enclosing countryside during the 1,000 years after the Norman invasion was seen by many as a terrible crime, either because it denied the commonry access to land (common grazing, woodland) that had previously been open for them to use, or because at its most extreme it led to people being cleared off the land entirely.

And this destruction goes way back, to the periods that we are all most interested in. From the moment when agriculture led to settlement and the ability to domesticate stock led to enclosure, man has been destroying the "natural" state of the countryside. Dartmoor, stunningly rich with prehistoric sites, is the product of an environmental disaster after all. It wasn't always wild and open moorland.

Ironically, the forests that you describe (although not planted with "native" species) reflect, in their tangled and impenetrable thickets, a much more accurate idea of what Britain looked like before man started to mess with the environment.

I don't disagree that where possible things should be "put back", but let's be realistic about this. You can't put it all back, unless you want to live in a portable tent and follow the migrating herds around.