Robin Hood and Little John forum 2 room
Image by Zeb
close
more_vert

thank you all for your encouragement.

Baza, actually I wasn't thinking of your comments at all! but now you've rattled my cage I may as well defend my standpoint.

You say you don't want to hear about the ideas of 'ignorant and superstitious people' - but surely you have to include the people of the Neolithic in this description (or were they part of some golden age, after which we got ignorant and superstitious again?). So why are you so interested in what this particular subset of i + s people got up to?

Surely the reasons behind the creation of many of the monuments in this country have to be founded in a profoundly different world view to our modern outlook today. Fair enough, some monuments do seem to be aligned on the seasons/certain stars/ the moon etc - but I think it would be stretching credibility to say they all are. You want the facts - but how are you ever going to get at the facts behind their creation really? I think you can measure all the stones you like but something will still be missing. You can look at the site's relationship to other sites, but something's still missing. You can dig up some knives and jewellery - but you can't get inside the mindset of a neolithic person. Besides, if you live in a culture you don't have to make it explicit to others of that culture what you believe, because the ideas of that culture are hegemony (?) and so you don't leave traces of them.

Erm. Also, the neolithic was a non-literate society. Telling stories would have been a very important way of passing on information about your people's history, their values, their aspirations. Ok so there may not be an undamaged chain between our stories now and theirs. But there are parallels between myths all over the world - probably because there are parallels between human experience throughout the world, and throughout time. Having modern technology doesn't change important parts of life like birth, love and death, good and evil, ideas about where we come from and how we should live.

If you look at Merrick's post in the 'milk' thread you'll see how stories about white cows are common in Britain. Maybe if cows were important in the Neolithic, maybe you would devise a story about a cow, and what this symbolised. Just maybe some memory of this got handed on. Maybe not.

But that's my take on why the extra dimension's important. Maybe you think it's arty wishy-washy nonsense, and maybe it is. It's not like you need a story to enjoy being at a site. But I don't think you should dismiss folklore as being from ignorant superstitious people, and therefore worthless.

Personally I think the wider the view you take of anything, the more holistic, the better you can understand it in its context, I'm sure you can't understand it any less.

Phew. That wasn't personal at all!!! and not aimed at you particularly. Just a few of my thoughts generally.

nicely reasoned argument Rhiannon...

I personally enjoy the folklore for it's own sake I must admit, but you've made me think twice about that. After all, who knows where the roots of some of these tales really lie.

Great stuff, keep it up.

Squiddo

There's a song by the much under-rated 'World Party' called "Always on My Mind". In the song he rails against modern society - decrying the social injustice and environmental damage that has become more and more extreme under capitalist consumerism. There's a piece in it, addressed to the leaders of the world;
>
> I'm sick of feeling sick of you
> You're too smart to be like this
> But you've got no legends that will guide your soul...
>
I believe that folklore / mythology is a hugely important process (for it is an ever-evolving process and not something static) that fulfills the function of anchoring people not only to their culture and past, but to the land itself. It's a way of passing wisdom down through generations. Of stressing the importance of certain things, and of certain places.

When i'm in rural Cork there's a phrase i hear a lot that i almost never hear in cities. "In the time of my grandfather..." is the opening line to many anecdote in rural pubs. And the story that follows it may be 50 years old, or it may be 1,000. I'm not sure i've ever heard someone say it (at least, not in the same way) in an urban setting.

Up until very recently the lives of every human being was inextricably tied up with the land they lived on. Today, people in cities, by and large, take no notice of the land that surrounds them. And with good reason - most of it's covered in concrete. Yet, i recall my grandmother (born and bred on a farm but moved to the city) telling amazing tales about the place she grew up. Many of them would start with "You might think I'm very old, but in the time of *my* grandmother..."

None of that is written down anywhere. And none of her decendants are passing those tales on. The city killed the folklore. In order for the city to effectively sever our link to the land, it doesn't suffice to simply insulate us physically from it. Our cultural and psychic anchors need to be detached too.

Consumerism, technology and urbanisation have successfully replaced our myths with soap-opera plotlines. And it's only by severing our connection to the land that capitalism can get away with poisoning it.

Anyways, forgive the unfocussed nature of this post. I have a jumble of thoughts about all this that i've yet to form into a single coherent argument. But i do feel that folklore about a specific site is an important part of that site. I kind of see those tales as being the mechanisms by which cultures protect those sites. Folklore becomes - in a very real sense - the magick spell that guards the place. Sadly the spell becomes uneffective when the folklore stops being passed down through the generations.

I`m quite happy to agree to disagree over this :-)

I don`t include the neolithic / bronze age people under the title `ignorant and superstitious people` simply because I presume that they were not ignorant about why they built there own structures.

It seems highly unlikely, to me, that any knowledge of prehistory is retained in folklore. We have very little knowledge of many times and events that occurred way after the eras that we are interested in. The Druids and whether there really was a King Arthur are a couple of examples that immediately spring to mind.

Although I think that the folklore about these sites does more to muddy the waters about them than to make things clearer, I do agree that the tales have, in the more recent past, served a useful purpose in helping to preserve them.

Most of the tales seem to follow certain patterns, e.g.

The devil / a giant / etc threw it at a church / his dog / etc and missed.

Dancers turned to stone.

At midnight, they all go down to the stream for a drink.

Someone took ten horses to drag a stone down a hill, he was plagued with misfortune until he used one horse to drag it back up again.


I just can`t see how such tales can add to our knowledge.

baz