Silbury Hill forum 180 room
Image by thesweetcheat
Silbury Hill

Grrr​…

close
more_vert

megadread wrote:
Mustard wrote:
Littlestone wrote:
Think you should post a link to that notice on their website Mr M. They still haven't withdrawn their comment that, "You can climb it for a view around the country side."
"Still"? Weren't those comments on the article only posted today? Give 'em a bloody chance!
I see they have removed my link to the pic of the sign. !
I can see only Nigel and AlanS' comments on their website - did they publish your comment and then delete it?

Well, a day and a half after AlanS first commented on their website, the offending line ("You can climb it for a view around the country side.") is still there. One wonders how much time they need to pull it (with an appropriate apology perhaps?).

Littlestone wrote:
megadread wrote:
Mustard wrote:
Littlestone wrote:
Think you should post a link to that notice on their website Mr M. They still haven't withdrawn their comment that, "You can climb it for a view around the country side."
"Still"? Weren't those comments on the article only posted today? Give 'em a bloody chance!
I see they have removed my link to the pic of the sign. !
I can see only Nigel and AlanS' comments on their website - did they publish your comment and then delete it?
I dunno, i could see the link i posted but it did state "post awaiting moderation" or something, can't see that now.

Littlestone wrote:
Well, a day and a half after AlanS first commented on their website, the offending line ("You can climb it for a view around the country side.") is still there. One wonders how much time they need to pull it (with an appropriate apology perhaps?).
Well...in the finest of English language what they said (You CAN climb it for a view around the countryside) is perfectly correct. But what they didn't add was... 'but you MAY not'. So it's misleading to their customers but not untruthful. Right, that's cleared that little misunderstanding up (sigh).