Silbury Hill forum 180 room
Image by Cursuswalker
close
more_vert

EdZiomek wrote:
Yours is the second comment using the term "undisturbed". I define that word as "no-extensive-bulldozer work", where modern roads, architected objects obliterate the figure.

Roman settlement? That is modernish history. Go back another 2000 years, that is probably the time-frame I am seeing most of. I have seen 1800 AD photographs of Navajo women wearing that hair style.

Stay skeptical, disbelieving, it is more than ok.

Hi EdZiomek,

Just like to say that my usage of the term "undisturbed" is defined by the area surrounding the Hill being a natural flood plain / water table. So in MY response, I doubt your hypothesis on the basis of extensive (and extended) flooding in the previous 4500 years of the Hill's lifetime. Mother Nature is a great bulldozer (I'm banking on her wiping ME out!)

Peace

Pilgrim

X

Sorry, i mean no personal offense but this is Jacobs without cheese, plain crackers.

Excellent points here, thank you.

And in the 4500 years of flood plain, were there any periods of dry lake bed?

And what is the age of Aries, which I say might explain the ram's horn hairdo or helmet of the first figure to the East of Silbury?

Age of Aries, Wikipedia... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_Aries#The_Age_of_Aries_.28The_Arian_Age.29

Heindel-Rosicrucian based interpretation: began in ca. 1658 BC and ended in ca. AD 498

Neil Mann interpretation: began in ca. 2150 BCE and ended in ca. AD 1.
Constellation boundary year:

Shephard Simpson interpretation: began ca. 1875 BC to ca. 100 BC

So the Ram's horn hairdo might fall within the 4500 years you mention, in a time of extended dryness? Or was it entirely flooded, for that entire time?

Just asking!!! PS, you are educating me, and a big thanks.