Silbury Hill forum 180 room
Image by photobabe
Silbury Hill

Satellite/Photography software reveals antiquities lock

close
more_vert
EdZiomek E
EdZiomek May 18, 2009 13:14:07
Replying to ocifant

And you want to be convinced, right? No can do.

You don't see the multiple items, I do without question. Eyes, nose, mouth, spiral hair, layers and layers of other artistic figures. And I see at least one figure, "in the raw", in the "Images" Gallery photo of the mound.

Yours is the second comment using the term "undisturbed". I define that word as "no-extensive-bulldozer work", where modern roads, architected objects obliterate the figure.

Roman settlement? That is modernish history. Go back another 2000 years, that is probably the time-frame I am seeing most of. I have seen 1800 AD photographs of Navajo women wearing that hair style.

Stay skeptical, disbelieving, it is more than ok.

P Pilgrim
Pilgrim May 18, 2009 20:06:40
Replying to EdZiomek

EdZiomek wrote:
Yours is the second comment using the term "undisturbed". I define that word as "no-extensive-bulldozer work", where modern roads, architected objects obliterate the figure.

Roman settlement? That is modernish history. Go back another 2000 years, that is probably the time-frame I am seeing most of. I have seen 1800 AD photographs of Navajo women wearing that hair style.

Stay skeptical, disbelieving, it is more than ok.

Hi EdZiomek,

Just like to say that my usage of the term "undisturbed" is defined by the area surrounding the Hill being a natural flood plain / water table. So in MY response, I doubt your hypothesis on the basis of extensive (and extended) flooding in the previous 4500 years of the Hill's lifetime. Mother Nature is a great bulldozer (I'm banking on her wiping ME out!)

Peace

Pilgrim

X

Like all websites everywhere, we use cookies.