Silbury Hill forum 180 room
Image by ocifant
close
more_vert

Littlestone wrote:
Lighten up or go away. Take your moanings (sic) onto HA forums, as Fitz (sic) suggests.
It's actually fitz with a lower case f - please do try to pay attention to detail and accuracy Mr Bennett.
Sorry LittleOne. I can't help it sometimes. I have to drop the occasional little mishtakes in, just to give you summat to moan about. Hmmm...though you moan about owt really, don't you? I want to have your babies!

Littlestone wrote:
Meanwhile, I note with interest that you haven't yet replied to Andy Norfolk's post at http://www.themodernantiquarian.com/forum/?thread=45354&message=566926 Perhaps you'd like to do that now (hopefully calmly and rationally and without your usual stream of insults and gutter language).
Done and dusted. Hope it's to your approval LittleOne. (you will tell me if I've been a bad boy, won't you? **wink**)

I love you - Paulus

xxx

I love you - Paulus

xxx

Oh dear... you really do need help Mr Bennett - sadly, I doubt if you will find it here.

By the way, I note yet again that (as with another thread) you have said absolutely nothing about the subject under discussion - in this case Silbury's structural integrity (though I seem to remember you saying something recently along the lines of starting a new thread with new information about the structure. Hmmm... that seems to have gone very quiet.

I really can't be bothered with your trolling antics anymore - please either add something of worth to this thread, and the subject under discussion, or go away. Your next post will prove, one way or another, if you have something of worth to contribute or are simply here to cause trouble.