Silbury Hill forum 180 room
Image by Snap
close
more_vert

nigelswift wrote:
"avoidance tactics in an attempt to minimise panic."

Wot, rioting in the streets? How thoughtful to have spared us that!

No, I'm not sure "praiseworthy secrecy" for the sake of either the public or the hill will fit with the facts, although I have little doubt that may come up, rather soon.

(The facts it doesn't fit with are that loads of people go up there all the time and all have eyes).

I’m absolutely flummoxed why any opinion with a mere sniff of understanding for EHs position/stance gets such swift rebuke.

Anyways, I’ll crawl back into the hole from whence I came and keep my opinions to myself in future.

I'm very sorry to have come over as being other than simply having an opinion that differs from yours in a friendly fashion, it wasn't my intention in the least I assure you.

I guess I approach it weighed down with a lot of previous baggage relating to a lack of information coming through and a feeling that whatever the motive this, above everything (since it seems to carry an increased risk over what was previously announced) ought to have been announced and explained before the event not after.