Silbury Hill forum 180 room
Image by texlahoma
close
more_vert

No update 12 yet?

Still waiting.
One thing (apart from many others) needs an urgent explanation IMO -
why is the central shaft being emptied of polystyrene now when it was always scheduled to be done only when the base had been fully stabilised?

Has it now been decided that the only way to stabilise the centre is accessing it from the top? Surely not?

The only other reason I can think of for going out of sequence is finance. £600K computes at maybe £50K a week so time's money. Is it thought better to utilise the plant and personnel on doing something rather than nothing since they are being paid for?

That would make sense, but only if it wasn't a more damaging or less effective solution and wasn't taking an extra risk (for both those involved and the archaeology).

Reassurance specifically about that is in EVERYONE'S interest, surely? I'd ask them, but what's the point?

..and if they *are* emptying the shaft, given the forecast for more rain later this week, what precautions are being taken to prevent further ingress of water from the top?

Questions, questions, and no answers!

nigelswift wrote:
One thing (apart from many others) needs an urgent explanation IMO -
why is the central shaft being emptied of polystyrene now when it was always scheduled to be done only when the base had been fully stabilised?
Aye. Especially when we were told that:

"The polystyrene in the summit crater would only be replaced with chalk once the voids at the base had been filled or supported, because of the additional weight loading."

http://www.britarch.ac.uk/BA/ba80/feat1.shtml

Makes you wonder, doesn't it?

Peace

Pilgrim

X