High Bridestones forum 1 room
Image by jobbo
High Bridestones

Calling fitzcoraldo lock

close
more_vert

I agree with everything you say - especially about soul. A great photograph begins its creation in the seeing eye and brain of the photographer long before a shuttter is clicked. You demonstrate that beautifully under your various aliases on the Portal and on TMA

Where I would disgree with you is in the example you give:
"This one nicely demonstrates the whole gamut of tones is well within range of the Canon 1Ds
http://www.pbase.com/image/55441617 and I would bet my last flash card that if this were presented as a medium format print it would be repeated in glowing terms that digital just doesn't have 'it'."

Sorry to deprive you of your last flash card, but it doesn't do it for me. Wish I could show you some prints I have inherited from the 1920's - drool. Ever seen the work of Whitby's Frank Meadow Sutcliffe taken between 1870 and 1910? - astonishing and matchless.

Anyway, we are way off topic and with canning little compacts with clever little programs for every situation - who needs to know anything about photography now?

PS - for a taste of Sutcliffe go to http://www.sutcliffe-gallery.co.uk/

Then there is the incomparable PH Emerson and his East Anglian studies - more drooling....

Maaaan, I can't believe you fellows are comparing the length of yours or anyone else's wangers in the printroom ONLINE!

Stop it now! Prints are prints, jpegs on screens are nasty compressed cack things. I nearly sprayed my malted goodness drink laughing when you said "nah, that jpeg on the screen is nowhere near as good as the real prints I've seen from nineteennumptynoo!"

Topic locked, c'mon. ;-)