Marlborough Mound forum 7 room
Image by postman
Marlborough Mound

Prehistoric origins confirmed!

close
more_vert
fachtna F
fachtna Jun 6, 2011 22:17:22
Replying to Littlestone

Littlestone wrote:
I'm sure you could provide many insights into the sites that we all love here, if only you would share some of your experiences and findings and engage with TMA more. Who knows, you might even garner a bit more sympathy for your cause? There's more than one way to skin a cat...
I’ll second that oci.

There must be a tremendous amount you could tell us about your work at Silbury and elsewhere fachtna – and I’m sure in so doing you’d make some very good friends here. Would you be prepared to answer some (non political) questions if we were to ask them?

Hi ocifant and Littlestone - many thanks for your messages'

I have never felt that I am seeking 'sympathy' in any way.

My 'cause' - as it were - is simply to present factual information so that anyone who is interested can make their own judgements in respect of the organisations and individuals involved in a series of events associated with and ultimately arising from my dismissal and exclusion from the English Heritage Silbury Hill Conservation Project on 15th June 2007.

Apologies for the long sentence.

I am very happy indeed to answer any questions.

best wishes

fachtna

R Rhiannon
Rhiannon Jun 7, 2011 01:21:39
Replying to fachtna

You're missing the point, people are encouraging you to talk about something other than that, can't you see!

O ocifant
ocifant Jun 7, 2011 05:32:54
Replying to fachtna

How about the question that Sanctuary asked that didn't get a reply?

do you have, or did you reach a different conclusion at the time of your involvement, on the build/purpose/reason for Silbury Hill that you feel that you would like to get across which is different to that of Jim Leary and David Field?
That's the kind of thing we'd like to hear here from you. You've already made your case on the other matter.

Like all websites everywhere, we use cookies.