Marlborough Mound forum 7 room
Image by Zeb
close

Well, what many of us always thought, the prehistoric origins of the Mound have now been confirmed. See news item on homepage.

That's exciting news! :)

Also means it can lose the "Disputed Antiquity" tag from the site page! http://www.themodernantiquarian.com/post/96908/news/marlborough_mound.html :)

G x

Any news on Silbaby lately?

Littlestone wrote:
Well, what many of us always thought, the prehistoric origins of the Mound have now been confirmed. See news item on homepage.
What took them so long to carry out what appears on the surface to be a simple operation?

What about access/ Isn't it in the grounds of a college?

That is pretty cool.

Sir Richard Colt Hoare knew it all along though you know.

...Then there's Gib Hill next to Arbor Low...

Ah.

I thought at first that this thread might have been about some of those who post here.

Now featured in the latest edition of The British Archaeology Magazine. Preview(s) here.

Good for local author Mavis Cheek who, writing of her new book in the Marlborough News Online yesterday, says,

“I’m thrilled that the Marlborough Mound has now been given back the dignity it deserves and dated properly to about 2400 BC – right in the middle of the agricultural cohesion and the building of grander edifices to show respect to the – we assume – forces of Nature.

“Gone, I hope, will be the shell grotto, the water feature, the silly trumperies of Lady Hertford’s eighteenth century excess – and returned to us will be the awesome site that we can stand and admire and know was one of the long-ago forerunners of our own innate spirituality.”