Skara Brae forum 6 room
Image by GLADMAN
Skara Brae

Skara Brae

close

I was looking through my guide books last night and I got to thinking......

Skara Brae is an internationaly important site (quite rightly so) yet there is little protection of the site.

When the visitor centre is closed you can walk around yourself.
There is a footpath running alongside the centre or access is easy from the beach.

All it would take is one lunatic with a sledgehammer and untold damage could be caused in no time at all.

Shouldn't these types of site be better protected?

I know you can't protect every standing stone / circle etc but a fragile site like Skara Brae could be easily damaged.

CARL wrote:
I was looking through my guide books last night and I got to thinking......

Skara Brae is an internationaly important site (quite rightly so) yet there is little protection of the site.

When the visitor centre is closed you can walk around yourself.
There is a footpath running alongside the centre or access is easy from the beach.

All it would take is one lunatic with a sledgehammer and untold damage could be caused in no time at all.

Shouldn't these types of site be better protected?

I know you can't protect every standing stone / circle etc but a fragile site like Skara Brae could be easily damaged.

Your are probably right Carl but as at most sites the obvious tends to be overlooked until damage is actually done. Having visited myself I like the freedom, I guess we all do and the view is probably being taken that if you have taken the time to come to the Orkney's from afar then you are a serious visitor with only good intentions. I found the Orcadian's very alive to their past (being an island person myself I understand that) and being very respective of it and unlikely to go out of their way to damage something of such importance. Then again...!

Hmmm... worrying point CARL (did you notice any CCTV cameras about?). Don’t know why they’re not installed at more sites - and they don’t need to be actually on site to be effective – they could be discretely hidden and powered by a solar panel like you see on many parking meters now).

In the end it comes down to us noticing these things and making suggestions to the authorities whose responsibility these sites are.

CARL wrote:
I was looking through my guide books last night and I got to thinking......

Skara Brae is an internationaly important site (quite rightly so) yet there is little protection of the site.

When the visitor centre is closed you can walk around yourself.
There is a footpath running alongside the centre or access is easy from the beach.

All it would take is one lunatic with a sledgehammer and untold damage could be caused in no time at all.

Shouldn't these types of site be better protected?

I know you can't protect every standing stone / circle etc but a fragile site like Skara Brae could be easily damaged.

There was a case of someone leaving graffiti there once I seem to recall - and a police investigation to track the perpetrator down. It would only be a visitor (not an Islander) who would do such a thing and they have to get off the island via a ferry.

On the other hand Carl, just at the moment there is heightened anxiety about a terrorist attack on London or the Olympics ... what's to stop someone determined to destroy in the name of some deep held belief. We live in worrying times - the idea of someone travelling to a remote archaeological site on a fairly remote island off the north-east coast of Scotland to make a notorious name for themselves must be quite low down the list.

Happened before (with a pen)
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/scotland/north_east/6951100.stm
I don't know if they found/charged him, I'd have made him lick it off I think.

You kind of have to hope that most people are decent human beings. The alternative is fencing off everything with razor wire, and that's not very atmospheric or aesthetic is it.

The Carrowmore visitor centre and this http://www.themodernantiquarian.com/site/8884/listoghil_tomb_51.html are the same, still open when the staff have left. The Carrowmore complex is vast and 'securing' it would be next to impossible. I prefer to show up when they've all gone anyway, having he place to myself rather than sharing it with half-interested tourists. Newgrange and Knowth would be places I'd visit more often were they less 'secure'. Modern 'security' measures often ruin these sites.

CCTV at Skara Brae? Brings to mind the American officer in Vietnam: 'It became necessary to destroy the town to save it'*

*http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ben_Tre

Was thinking about this earlier. Its worth reminding ourselves that the biggest threat to Skara Brae is from the sea and the weather and not just Skara Brae ...
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/scotland/north_east/8181061.stm
(News link three years old but still relevant)

Well I for one hope they don't over protect, ive been once before and was bitterly disappointed at the restricted access, hoping to one day have a proper look round and get into the place proper. Granted , if I find anyone wirth a sledgehammer or spraypaint their body wont be found for several days.
The idea that only an outsider would be that much of an arse to deface it is I think setting the islanders on too high a pedestal, there are arses everywhere and I mean everywhere.

CARL wrote:
I got to thinking......

There is a footpath running alongside... access is easy... All it would take is one lunatic with a sledgehammer and untold damage could be caused in no time at all.

Shouldn't these types of site be better protected?

I know you can't protect every standing stone / circle etc but a fragile site could be easily damaged.

Yes vandalism happens and I agree that some remote sites are vulnerable as are less remote ones. You can see vandalism in Maes Howe where Norsemen carved graffiti into the ancient monument. Check out the Dwarfie Stane for some esoteric 20th C carving by a weird Richard Hannay type. I don't mean to be awkward but I genuinely see a continuation of some sort there (I mean well beyond some eejit daubing marker pen on Skara Brae's fine slabwork).

I'm off back to Arran on Saturday for more stoning, rock art (wherever you are Jan I'm keeping on rocking!) and a full-on family holiday. On Arran the Kings Caves have graffiti going back thousands of years - from cups to fish to curly snakes to Ogham Script to christian crosses and some weird human figures. I don't know where the line is to be drawn regarding defacement, as the christianised element of the site means that some christians come and paint up the crosses each year. Is this defacement/ graffitti/ vandalism of a earlier non-christian site? Also nearby, if you know where to look, there is also a slab with two human footprints carved into it - but I'm no telling where...
Up at Giant's Graves there is a monster slab of a capstone which is totally covered in graffiti. These people didn't just take hammers... they took chisels as well! One vertical row of names are the crew of a 1st World War warship which was sunk with total loss of life. But sometime before that the ship was moored in Whiting Bay, the crew were on shore leave and tramped up to the Giant's Graves and carved their names. I always think about those dead guys who thought that the Giant's Graves were important enough to visit before their battle deployment and bad deaths. Harry Lauder carved his name there as well! You can see them in this photo.

http://www.themodernantiquarian.com/img_fullsize/92197.jpg

There is something I really like about that capstone. The graffitti hasn't destroyed the stone (thankfully it didn't shatter under all the hammer and chisel blows) but in some way I feel the graffiti has added something, maybe a new layer of history to it. The other year I had to remove the remains of a fire and hearth which had been constructed by idiots within the Giant's Graves. The site is unprotectable from idiots. Many of the tall monoliths on Machrie have Victorian and 20th C vandalism. Indeed one stone was felled for shaping into a millstone. It still lies there, roughly shaped and snapped like a discarded jammy-ring biscuit.
I found some new (old) rock art panels near Rutherford's Witnesses in Galloway in October last year. Beside the cups and rings were two people's names and the date of 1870. The "1870" was the only thing exposed at first (which caught my eye). It was peeling the turf back around it which revealed the older stuff which I suspected would be there.
I'm not saying vandalism and graffiti are good things to do with ancient monuments. We cannot undo some stuff like the Roman and Norse graffiti and the later christianising of monoliths, stone circles and Pictish Symbol Stones. The Victorian period left a lot of individuals names and marks on stones as has the 20th Century. Most of the "defacements" I have come across are really part of a historical record and add another layer of human interaction with a site.

I used to get my wing mirrors kicked off regularly when I lived in Central Edinburgh. Mindless vandalism. Beyond sitting in my car all day and night I couldn't do anything to protect against it. CCTV might help but I dont think we can actually protect any sites from people determined to destroy.