CARL wrote:
I got to thinking......
There is a footpath running alongside... access is easy... All it would take is one lunatic with a sledgehammer and untold damage could be caused in no time at all.
Shouldn't these types of site be better protected?
I know you can't protect every standing stone / circle etc but a fragile site could be easily damaged.
Yes vandalism happens and I agree that some remote sites are vulnerable as are less remote ones. You can see vandalism in Maes Howe where Norsemen carved graffiti into the ancient monument. Check out the Dwarfie Stane for some esoteric 20th C carving by a weird Richard Hannay type. I don't mean to be awkward but I genuinely see a continuation of some sort there (I mean well beyond some eejit daubing marker pen on Skara Brae's fine slabwork).
I'm off back to Arran on Saturday for more stoning, rock art (wherever you are Jan I'm keeping on rocking!) and a full-on family holiday. On Arran the Kings Caves have graffiti going back thousands of years - from cups to fish to curly snakes to Ogham Script to christian crosses and some weird human figures. I don't know where the line is to be drawn regarding defacement, as the christianised element of the site means that some christians come and paint up the crosses each year. Is this defacement/ graffitti/ vandalism of a earlier non-christian site? Also nearby, if you know where to look, there is also a slab with two human footprints carved into it - but I'm no telling where...
Up at Giant's Graves there is a monster slab of a capstone which is totally covered in graffiti. These people didn't just take hammers... they took chisels as well! One vertical row of names are the crew of a 1st World War warship which was sunk with total loss of life. But sometime before that the ship was moored in Whiting Bay, the crew were on shore leave and tramped up to the Giant's Graves and carved their names. I always think about those dead guys who thought that the Giant's Graves were important enough to visit before their battle deployment and bad deaths. Harry Lauder carved his name there as well! You can see them in this photo.
http://www.themodernantiquarian.com/img_fullsize/92197.jpg
There is something I really like about that capstone. The graffitti hasn't destroyed the stone (thankfully it didn't shatter under all the hammer and chisel blows) but in some way I feel the graffiti has added something, maybe a new layer of history to it. The other year I had to remove the remains of a fire and hearth which had been constructed by idiots within the Giant's Graves. The site is unprotectable from idiots. Many of the tall monoliths on Machrie have Victorian and 20th C vandalism. Indeed one stone was felled for shaping into a millstone. It still lies there, roughly shaped and snapped like a discarded jammy-ring biscuit.
I found some new (old) rock art panels near Rutherford's Witnesses in Galloway in October last year. Beside the cups and rings were two people's names and the date of 1870. The "1870" was the only thing exposed at first (which caught my eye). It was peeling the turf back around it which revealed the older stuff which I suspected would be there.
I'm not saying vandalism and graffiti are good things to do with ancient monuments. We cannot undo some stuff like the Roman and Norse graffiti and the later christianising of monoliths, stone circles and Pictish Symbol Stones. The Victorian period left a lot of individuals names and marks on stones as has the 20th Century. Most of the "defacements" I have come across are really part of a historical record and add another layer of human interaction with a site.
I used to get my wing mirrors kicked off regularly when I lived in Central Edinburgh. Mindless vandalism. Beyond sitting in my car all day and night I couldn't do anything to protect against it. CCTV might help but I dont think we can actually protect any sites from people determined to destroy.