>>You may be right about my mother, but I can't ask her as she died recently. A low jibe even
>> for pondlife..
On the first point: nothing I say will amend that.
>> The point I am making is that signs attract vandalism - they do nothing to protect or deter.
I would agree with you if we were talking about an inner-city place. Here we are talking about a place where mainly responsible people go, who would probably be quite bothered about damaging the site if they knew it was there.
>> A pop at Heritage in Action - no not really
Well, changing their name from 'Heritage Action' to 'Heritage inAction' (you left the space out previously) is having a pop if it was done intentionally.
>> though I did think that the recent tale of woe about the chairman not wanting to meet EH was
>> sad.
I agree
>> Why people on forums cannot disagree without resorting to personal offence is beyond my
>> understanding.
As are many things I suspect.
>> I do care about ancient sites and just don't believe that silly signs will help at all.
And it's your right to believe that. I just believe that you are very wrong. Also, no one has suggested putting up 'silly signs' have they? I think most people want a sensible sign.
>> Maybe I'm wrong, but maybe you are
Maybe.
>> - now that is the ultimate heresy on a TMA forum - to suggest, nay even hint that FW could
>> be wrong about anything. The master leads and the sheep follow.
You flatter me, but that's bollocks :-)
