Slaggyford Stones forum 1 room
Image by StoneGloves
close
more_vert

tiompan wrote:
tjj wrote:
tiompan wrote:
Another example you might have mentioned is the use of antural markings within genuine rock art ,look at how the man made markings are enclosed in natural markings . http://www.themodernantiquarian.com/site/6641/craig_hill.html .This is not uncommon and the questiion is did the engravers see these natural markings as convenient frames or whether they maybe perceived as earlier man made markings .
Tiompan, I think I've learnt a lot from a few of the posts here, especially with regard to natural markings. Do you mind me asking about the above example - is it possible that the natural markings occurred after the man-made carvings as sandstone can crack and split over long periods of time.
June , I have just realised that I should mentioned what pic to go to get the best example . The particular case I was thinking of was pic 29 from the top left .
As it's not an uncommon feature to find the natural markings incorporated into man made designs it suggests that the natural was primary but that doesn't mean it couldn't have occurred later . In the case above (no 29 )because there are multiple "frames " I think that is more certain natural first .
Yes I can see what you are saying clearly on image 29. Thanks G.

Now that you have shown that the rock art surveyors did find one of my stones, and comparison of their and my map references are close enough to be the same place, would you be so kind as to request that the 'of disputed antiquity' label be lifted. Thanks. If you don't like the term 'standing stones' then perhaps you could ask that it be changed to 'rock art'.